User talk:BeanieFan11/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

November 2020

Hello, I'm P,TO 19104. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Darren Sproles, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 21:08, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Stork00589.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Stork00589.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 03:45, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Drew Wilkins (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Drew Wilkins and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Drew Wilkins, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 03:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, BeanieFan11! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 03:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beanie Eberts

Beanie Eberts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Youngjtdyt (talk) 06:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	For your great articles about NFL. Your first award is given. Cupper52 (talk) 12:30, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank You. :) – BeanieFan11 (talk | contribs) 00:56, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi BeanieFan11, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:48, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
15		Pottstown Firebirds (talk)	Add sources
3		Boston Sweepers (talk)	Add sources
1,911		American Football League (talk)	Add sources
13		Pittsburg High School (California) (talk)	Add sources
41,497		Aaron Rodgers (talk)	Add sources
526		Dan Fouts (talk)	Add sources
35		Jonathan S. Tobin (talk)	Cleanup
71		Michigan Panthers (talk)	Cleanup
307,852		Tom Brady (talk)	Cleanup
4,463		NFC Championship Game (talk)	Expand
9		Jimmy Klingler (talk)	Expand
36		T. J. Edwards (talk)	Expand
4,731		San Francisco 49ers (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
13,693		Joe Montana (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2,543		Terrell Owens (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
265		New Trier High School (talk)	Merge
5,190		Los Angeles Rams (talk)	Merge
99		Mob Squad (American football) (talk)	Merge
190		National Football League rivalries (talk)	Wikify
22		Montana PBS (talk)	Wikify
57		Minnesota–Wisconsin football rivalry (talk)	Wikify
2		Carl Mankat (talk)	Orphan
2		Pat Duffy (American football) (talk)	Orphan
2		Dick Faust (talk)	Orphan
10		John Pitts (American football) (talk)	Stub
3		Richmond Rebels (talk)	Stub
4		Bob Joswick (talk)	Stub
13		Doc Alexander (talk)	Stub
40		Crenshaw Christian Center (talk)	Stub
98		Shay Rudolph (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

FYI

Hello B. Thanks for your editing here at the 'pedia. One thing to be aware of when you run refill2 there are some bare urls that it can't fix. For example when you removed the tag here there were still 10 references that were bare urls. I formatted them with this edit. But I only knew they were still bare because I was on that page while you were editing it. If I hadn't been there I would not have known that there were still refs to fix. After you rtun refill2 it is always a good idea to scroll down and check the reference section to see whether there are any bare urls left over. If there are any left just leave the template at the top of the page and other editors will come along to finish things up. Some editors will get bent out of shape if any refs are missed and you don't want to get messages from them when all you are trying to do is help. Thanks again and cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 23:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi again. The same thing happened at the Peter Coveney article. You removed the template but there were still 4 bare urls. You will want to go back and check any other articles that you have run refill2 on to see it it missed any other bare urls. Thanks. MarnetteD|Talk 23:43, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Oh, sorry, I didn't realize that. I'll check the articles I did refill2 with. Thanks for letting me know. BeanieFan11 (talk | contribs) 00:06, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

I have a question, what if there is no title for a citation? Would it still need to changed? Thanks. BeanieFan11 (talk | contribs) 00:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

It might have to be done manually but I would have to see it to be sure B. I forgot to mention that when you run refill2 if you get the message "The tool encountered some errors." in the field just below the blue line that means some refs could not be put into cite templates. When that happens you can save the ones that did get fixed and leave the rest for other editors to finish up. Enjoy your Sunday. MarnetteD|Talk 02:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi BeanieFan11! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Images, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Issues with reFill

Hi BeanieFan, you should probably be aware that reFill is very much an imperfect tool, especially since its development appears to have been abandoned some time ago. This means that whenever you use it on an article with a dead link, it will insert the deprecated |deadurl= parameter, rather than the now used |url-status=dead, which will invariably cause a whole lotta red in the reference section. I'd appreciate it if you could check your future edits for this so they don't show up in the tracking category. Thanks! AngryHarpy‍^talk 07:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Deprodding of Graham Leigh

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Graham Leigh, which you proposed for deletion. The subject appears to pass WP:GNG. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:58, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi BeanieFan11! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Multiple Questions, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi BeanieFan11! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Pud/Albert Kent, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:05, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Navboxes

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ten_Conference_football_individual_awards#Ameche–Dayne_Running_Back_of_the_Year When you have time you should make navboxes for all these awards Bigmike2346 (talk) 02:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

@Bigmike2346 Ok, thanks. Is it for all of them or just the ones below the Ameche Dayne Running Back of the Year Award? And by the way, I saw you put on the Desmond Kitchings talk page you wanted a redirect for Des Kitchings (I did that). To make a redirect page, all you have to put is #REDIRECT Name of Article (If you didn't already know). BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:14, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

I didn’t thanks, might as well make a na box for all of them Bigmike2346 (talk) 18:30, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rimington-Pace Offensive Lineman of the Year

Template:Rimington-Pace Offensive Lineman of the Year has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:15, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Brian Flones

According to Pro Football Reference[1], Flones only played in the 1981 and 82 seasons. Do you have any sources that says he played in 1983?-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 02:51, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

@UCO2009bluejay I added that for two reasons. 1. Someone claiming to be Brian Flones asked on the WikiProject NFL talk page and 2. On this it says he was on the physically unable to perform list. So while he didn't play in 83 he was still with the team. Also, could you tell me what you think of Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League#Questions for NFL, CFL projects. Thanks. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

That source clears it up.-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 03:25, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Howard Carson (American football), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Los Angeles Express. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jimmy Snyder (racing driver), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tailback.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Badara Traore (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Badara Traore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Badara Traore, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 10:05, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

J. B. Andrews

Nice work finding sources. You might take a look at the categories of the article, as there are are no sports related cats currently on the page.4meter4 (talk) 18:47, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Leo Jensvold

On 18 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Leo Jensvold, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Iowa Hawkeye Leo Jensvold played starting quarterback alongside his twin brother in 1930? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Leo Jensvold. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Leo Jensvold), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:03, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1979 Portland State Vikings football team (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eternal Shadow was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1979 Portland State Vikings football team and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:1979 Portland State Vikings football team, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eternal Shadow Talk 17:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Giants–Packers rivalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Daily Courier.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brad Fichtel has been accepted

Brad Fichtel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curbon7 (talk) 23:00, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greg Cleveland has been accepted

Greg Cleveland, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 00:48, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for adding the statements and references about how these football players participated in regulation NFL games so it makes it clear they meet WP:NGRIDIRON and WP:SPORTBASIC beyond the "Trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may be used to support content in an article, but it is not sufficient to establish notability. This includes listings in database sources with low, wide-sweeping generic standards of inclusion, such as Sports Reference's college football and basketball databases" AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 00:48, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Mohring (linebacker) has been accepted

John Mohring (linebacker), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 16:50, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

• Hey BeanieFan11, good work and so good to see after all the complete junk and minimal stubs we normally get. I re-rated as Start class based on ORES that has said 50/50 on start vs C before the tidy up, but it wouldn't take much more to get to C class - an image would help. Anyway great work and you may like to check the rest of the IPs recent rejections (or even the accepted minimal stubs). Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 16:54, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Nelson (offensive lineman) has been accepted

Mark Nelson (offensive lineman), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 13:48, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Gartner has been accepted

Chris Gartner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 20:10, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 1969–70 Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens women's basketball team, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Hayleez (talk) 16:08, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1900 Drexel Dragons football team has been accepted

1900 Drexel Dragons football team, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Craig Davison (talk) 09:48, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1979 Portland State Vikings football team has been accepted

1979 Portland State Vikings football team, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chetsford (talk) 17:23, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

All caps in citations

BeanieFan11, just a little heads up. When you cite a newspaper article with a title printed in all caps, you want to convert that to title case on Wikipedia. See my edit at John Tosi (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Tosi&diff=1032687959&oldid=1032683157) and MOS:ALLCAPS. Keep up the good work. Jweiss11 (talk) 18:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:44, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Tosi

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Tosi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harper J. Cole -- Harper J. Cole (talk) 11:21, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Tosi

The article John Tosi you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:John Tosi for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harper J. Cole -- Harper J. Cole (talk) 14:21, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Tosi

The article John Tosi you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John Tosi for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harper J. Cole -- Harper J. Cole (talk) 20:02, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:The Wilmington Mercury has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Wilmington Mercury. Thanks! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 18:18, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Wilmington Mercury has been accepted

The Wilmington Mercury, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 18:29, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Delaware State football coaches

I found some new sources that indicate that John L. McKinley was Delaware State's coach in 1931, not 1932; see https://www.newspapers.com/clip/82449621/the-new-york-age/. Seems that Edward Jackson probably became coach in 1932 based on this article: https://www.newspapers.com/clip/82450851/california-eagle/. Not sure where James Powell Calvin fits in. Perhaps he coached in 1930 or earlier? I haven't been able to find anything on him. Jweiss11 (talk) 02:30, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

@Jweiss11 Thanks for clearing that up, some of these early Del. State seasons are getting so confusing for me. In my search of Newspapers.com from 1924 to 1930, I only found a coach mentioned once (Coach Naylor, which I later figured out was John D. Naylor). I also didn't find anything for James Powell Calvin. What do you think should be done about the article? BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:49, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Where did you find that mention of Naylor coaching Delaware State in 1927? I found his 1955 obituary: https://www.newspapers.com/clip/82523297/the-morning-news/, https://www.newspapers.com/clip/82523311/obituary-for-naylor/. Jweiss11 (talk) 06:10, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

@Jweiss11 this article about Delaware (then Dover?) State v. Howard High (Wilmington) mentions "Coach Naylor of the Dover team...". I assumed it was John D. Naylor because I doubt there would be another 1920s Delaware football "coach Naylor". BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:15, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Goldey–Beacom College football

BeanieFan11, regarding those edits on the categories, we generally have one set of categories for college athletic/football programs where there was a merger between two institutions and a combining of the programs. Category:Case Western Spartans football is the most robust example. When did Goldey and Beacon combine to form Goldey–Beacom College? Were the two football team still around? We need to think about how this all syncs up with the extant Goldey–Beacom Lightning. Jweiss11 (talk) 23:13, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

@Jweiss11 see my edit summary here. Goldey and Beacom merged in 1951, Goldey football was discontinued in c. 1933 while Beacom was 1935. BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:44, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. Any idea when the Lightning nickname came into usage? Did the two school have nicknames before the football programs folded in the 1930s? Jweiss11 (talk) 23:48, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

@Jweiss11 it appears per this that the "Lighting" nickname was adopted in 1998/1999. So far for Goldey (I haven't done a deep search on either yet), I haven't found any nickname. It appeared the same for Beacom, except I saw a few mentions of "Beacomites", but that may be just because of the school name. BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:12, 1 August 2021 (UTC)