Bdegroodt

ROMO Analysis

A tag has been placed on ROMO Analysis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 21:14, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

With no significant progress on this article, a bot has removed the {{underconstruction}} template and I have replaced the speedy-delete flag for blatant advertising. Realkyhick 03:07, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of ROMO Analysis

ROMO Analysis, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that ROMO Analysis satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ROMO Analysis and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of ROMO Analysis during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Realkyhick 16:46, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Motorcycling Wikiproject

Welcome to the Motorcycling WikiProject. Hopefully you have a good time, start many new articles and can contribute lots to the existing ones as we need that. Cheers ww2censor 19:43, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

A Motorcycle Wiki

Hey Bdegroodt, Here's an opportunity to put your expertise on motorcycles to more work. Cycle Chaos is a Wiki-styled web site that needs a lot of help from people who love bikes and can contribute more information and even more manufacturers. There's virtually no problems with administrators and it seems free to edit without any trouble. You seem to be someone who can offer some content, images, categories, that may be lacking. My user page is: Cycle Chaos, Noles1984 so stop by and say hello and see if you can be of help. Thanks. Noles1984 (talk) 17:37, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Interesting project you left me a message on. Thanks. Are you interested in the domain wikimotorcycles.org? Bdegroodt (talk) 05:51, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm always interested in motorcycles and furthering knowledge on that. Just watched the HD Theater show on MotoCzysz and Michael Czysz which made it worse for me since I have limited time on certain subject areas and wish I had more time. I looked for Wikimotorcycles.org and could not find that URL. Does it exist or is it "in the works"? -Chuck | Noles1984 (talk) 15:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of David J Williams

I have nominated David J Williams, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David J Williams. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Chzz  ►  01:13, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

• Since the books haven't been published yet, they can't really be used to establish notability. Book deals can still fall through before they ever reach publication. However, the claim of a record advance and praise from award nominees is promising. Can you provide verification for that in the AFD discussion? - Mgm|^(talk) 10:27, 14 May 2009 (UTC)