Bblqk37

Non-free rationale for File:WILLIQMrOBB.Jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:WILLIQMrOBB.Jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:15, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:WILLIQMrOBB.Jpg

Thanks for uploading File:WILLIQMrOBB.Jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bblqk37/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Bblqk37/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:27, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Bblqk37! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:27, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Hello, I'm M.Bitton. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cairngorm Club have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. M.Bitton (talk) 14:22, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Bblqk37. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Cairngorm Club, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 15:33, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Cairngorm Club

Hello BBlqk37, I'm becoming increasingly concerned about your edits to the Cairngorm Club. In particular:

• If you have some existing or previous relationship with the subject of the article then you may have a conflict of interest and should ideally avoid editing articles on those kind of subjects, or declare your interest when editing.
• The article sets out the lack of clarity around exactly when the club was established. It would be inaccurate to claim that there is no ambiguity and that the club is the oldest as opposed to one of the oldest. Please refrain from making that change without good reason.
• You have repeatedly added a statement to the article that the club is registered as a charity "for tax avoidance purposes". Please do not do so again unless and until you can provide reliable sources that support that claim.
• You are clearly involved in an edit war on the article, albeit a slow one, and should know this is not acceptable. On that basis, please read and heed the following warning:

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Thank you for your cooperation. WaggersTALK 11:08, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Staflo drilling rig

Hello, Bblqk37. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Staflo drilling rig, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Staflo drilling rig

Hello, Bblqk37. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Staflo drilling rig".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:50, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Cairngorm Club. M.Bitton (talk) 15:44, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your threat of blocking. I was simplifying the header as there is an argument about whether this is a mountaineering or hillwalking club. To avoid this I am simply stating that it is a club. If you wish to block me from Wikipedia please go ahead. Bblqk37 (talk) 15:56, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

I suggest you don't ignore #Managing_a_conflict_of_interest. M.Bitton (talk) 16:01, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. I have read managing a conflict of interest. Could you please explain why you think a simple change to a header and adding valid, correct information is a conflict of interest? Can you please supply your full name and country of residence. Many thanks again for your interest. Bblqk37 (talk) 16:36, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Asking that is not wise. For starters, people have a right to be anonymous here. Second, it just sound creepy to even ask. Third, it isn't any of your business. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:39, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Nothing creepy.It is my business if you are threatening to block me. I think you are in the USA. The lost white tribe of North America. Ruined the English language and our economy. Now you telling us what to do? Is it any wonder we don't like Americans in the UK or Russia. Bblqk37 (talk) 18:05, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 16:44, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. I live in the UK. Wikipedia is a political tool of the USA administration, who seek to promote their capitalist agenda overseas. You do not have any power or legal right to block me from anything in the UK. Legal consequences will follow. How would you like to be extradited to the UK or Guantanamo Bay without any legal process? Bblqk37 (talk) 18:34, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Star Mississippi 16:53, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Star Mississippi 18:36, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. You are in the USA. As you have blocked me from Wikipedia I revoke my permission to publish any text or photograph on Wikipedia of which I am the sole author. Wikipedia is controlled by the USA and seeks to promote your country and agenda. This is political propaganda and control of free speech. Have you read 1984 by Gearge Orwell? Bblqk37 (talk) 18:24, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

I have, twice and saw the movie with John Hurt. Truly sublime, although I prefer the ending in the book. Oh, you might want to read the license we use, Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You can't withdraw permission once you publish. You can release that text under any other license you want anywhere else, but you can't change the license for material you already agreed to release under CCSA 3.0. Sorry, it doesn't work like that. You can't put the toothpaste back in the tube. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 19:53, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Star Mississippi 19:06, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #61011

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:58, 20 July 2022 (UTC)