Your submission at Articles for creation: KiTalbum (May 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Bbbjunu! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:KiTalbum

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:KiTalbum, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

May 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm DoubleGrazing. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: KiTalbum (May 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Theroadislong (talk) 07:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

May 2024

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:14, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bbbjunu (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, first of all, I am a bit baffled by the current situation. I am a big K-pop fan, and there exists a completely new type of physical album in the K-pop market called a KiTalbum. I realized there was absolutely no information about it on Wikipedia, so I just organized some details about it, and now I'm suspended, which is really upsetting. I did realize after seeing feedback that what I wrote could seem like an advertisement. However, I wrote it purely from a fan's perspective, and if you could give me the benefit of the doubt and lift the restriction, I will make an effort to write from a more objective viewpoint. Bbbjunu (talk) 01:43, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Your now-deleted draft said "we created", suggesting the writer- you- is associated with this product in some way. If so, then you are lying to us by telling us that you are just a fan and you actually have a conflict of interest and are a paid editor. If not, then you lazily copied the content from elsewhere(perhaps the company website) and/or are too much of a fan to be able to write about this topic neutrally, to the point where it seems like you have a conflict of interest. I don't have to figure out which since, either way, that means there are no grounds to remove the block. I suggest that if you make a new request that you be fully open and honest with us. 331dot (talk) 07:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.