Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.
edit

While it is possible for you to donate the text of your thesis to Wikipedia, it is very unlikely to be suitable for inclusion. Academic papers do not generally follow our prohibition on original research (at least one hopes they do! :-) ). You are much more likely to be successful writing content appropriate to Wikipedia if you start de novo. Danger High voltage! 18:20, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your advice.

edit

Your reply was very helpful. I have drafted a new page from scratch and submitted the revision. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bayuk (talkcontribs) 21:08, 29 December 2012‎

Responding to your email.

edit

Hi there. Thanks for contacting me; I prefer to work via talk pages unless the issue involves private information. (It's totally not a big deal though, just a Wikipedian thing I guess.)

I definitely think that the topic is a good candidate for an article. After all, you were able to write a whole thesis about it, so clearly there's material out there. However, looking at the text that you've submitted, I don't think that the text itself is going to be very useful, since it's just not in the form of a Wikipedia article. It's mostly a style issue; encyclopedia articles start out with "Topic is blah blah..." and present information in a different way than academic writing. I encourage you to skim through the guide to writing better articles, which explains better than I can what Wikipedia articles are supposed to look like.

I hope this makes some sense. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask them here or on my talk page. You can also ask questions at the Teahouse. Danger High voltage! 19:32, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Signature

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   or   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. - David Biddulph (talk) 15:55, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

The Teahouse Turns One!

edit

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!


  Teahouse First Birthday Badge
Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year!

To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:30, 27 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Security as an Attribute concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Security as an Attribute, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:22, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Security as an Attribute

edit
 

Hello Bayuk. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Security as an Attribute".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Security as an Attribute}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:01, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply