User talk:Ronherry/Archives/2021/June

Welcome!

Hello, BawinV, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GermanJoe (talk) 17:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Me!

On 8 June 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Me!, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that spelling is fun, according to Taylor Swift? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Me!. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Me!), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

l

Hi Bawin, your changes to the Spotify most played song in a week were based on a false report. The most streamed song is "7 rings" https://spotifycharts.com/regional/global/weekly/2019-01-18--2019-01-25 Weeneilly (talk) 09:51, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I have posted this in the wrong place and don't know how to undo

Weeneilly (talk) 09:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

@Weeneilly: How's it false? Spotify app is a primary source, is not verified information, unless reported by secondary sources. CNN is the secondary source, whole this is the statement from Spotify themselves. BawinV (talk) 09:56, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

@Bawin: This is very confusing. The Spotify Tweet and the CNN report disagree with Spotify's own chart. Have you checked the true primary source, which is the spotify chart, which I linked above? The Tweet and the CNN report are factually incorrect. Ariana Grande had over 71m streams week ending 18th Jan 2019 and Olivia Rodrigo only 65m.

@Weeneilly: Discuss here. BawinV (talk) 17:39, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Christmas Tree Farm

On 25 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Christmas Tree Farm, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Taylor Swift wrote, recorded, and released "Christmas Tree Farm" in six days? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Christmas Tree Farm. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Christmas Tree Farm), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

l

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Archer (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sagittarius (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:28, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rare (Selena Gomez album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bad Liar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:47, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Map of the Soul: 7

Hi. I have seen that you have contributed a lot to the Lover album page, and was thinking if you might be interested in improving the Map of the Soul: 7 album article as well. Thank you.--Ashleyyoursmile (talk) 03:43, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Requests for deletion of older non-free file revisions, and information about non-free (manual) reduction

Hi. You may notice that I have reduced two of your recent audio samples (see below and the comments in file histories), and I have added the orphaned non-free revision deletion tag to your most recent upload (besides the bot tagging another).

1. To request deletion of orphaned non-free revisions, you can add {{subst:orfurrev}} to the file description page source, which will start a 7-day grace period for orphaned non-free revision deletion per WP:CSD#F5.
2. With regards to length of samples, per WP:SAMPLE it should not exceed 30 seconds or 10% of the original song length, whichever is shorter.
   • For example, with File:Look What You Made Me Do by Taylor Swift.mp3, the maximum permitted sample length is 21.1 seconds, 10% of the song's original length which is 3:31 or 211 seconds.
   • Another example that I reduced is File:Lover by Taylor Swift.mp3. The maximum permitted sample length is 22.1 seconds (out of original 3:41 or 221 seconds); I did exactly 22 seconds.
3. With regards to "reduced quality", 320 kbit/s is not a reduced quality. I reduced both samples listed above to mono at 56 kbit/s (and sample rate to 44.1 kHz from 48 kHz); you can do mono at 64 kbit/s, if 56 is not enough.

I hope this should answer what you might ask. If you need to reply, using {{Reply to}} (with the target user/s; see the template documentation) triggers notification/s to user/s you are replying to.

Regards, Ntx61 (talk) 16:07, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I keep forgetting I need to add an edit summary! Won't forget next time BawinV (talk) 16:01, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Americana & the Heartbreak Prince, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halsey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 8 May 2020 (UTC) l

DYK for Cardigan (song)

On 12 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cardigan (song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Taylor Swift wrote the lyrics to the song "Cardigan" to co-writer Aaron Dessner's music in around five hours? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Cardigan (song)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

That's awesome. Thank You. BawinV (talk) 08:56, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

New message from Narutolovehinata5

Hello, Ronherry. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Folklore (Taylor Swift album).
Message added 08:50, 7 September 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 08:50, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Archiving of web articles

Hi BawinV. Do you know how to archive that new Billboard link in Wayback Machine? --Efe (talk) 14:18, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Yes, I do. I'll do it. BawinV (talk) 15:01, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! --Efe (talk) 15:57, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Folklore (Taylor Swift album)

On 20 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Folklore (Taylor Swift album), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that William Bowery, who co-wrote two songs on Taylor Swift's album Folklore, appeared to have no online presence, and is possibly a pseudonym? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Folklore (Taylor Swift album). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Folklore (Taylor Swift album)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

All Too Well

I would like to know your reasons for reverting my edit on All Too Well. It seemed to me that the information was relevant to the paragraph, as it provided insight into the popularity of the song among the Taylor Swift fanbase. You provided no comment on the reversion when you performed it so I would appreciate a reason why it was removed. Minimac93 (talk) 19:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

@Minimac93: because it's neither from publication nor from a reliable site. it's literally a blog. Blogs cannot be used as Wikipedia sources. Regards. BawinV (talk) 20:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

@BawinV: Okay I understand the logic. Could it be rephrased to be a comment on the popularity within the reddit fan community, in order to follow the Wikipedia policy on self-published sources?

@Minimac93: Its popularity amidst fans is already notes in the article. And, blogs can NEVER be used as sources. BawinV (talk) 19:42, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

@BawinV: Fair enough. Have a good day, thanks for the insight. Minimac93 (talk) 20:58, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Taylor Swift

Hi, I saw that you reverted my bit on Red from "incorporates various pop and rock styles" to "experimented with various dance-pop, rock and electronic styles". Most critics agreed that the album is mainly pop and rock, not dance-pop or electronic, so I think it'd be better to keep it as "pop and rock". I don't know why you used the word "annex" for Speak Now, which is an odd word choice, and I think "incorporates" is much simpler and easier to understand. The same goes for "draws influence from hip hop" (why not just "incorporates hip hop elements", because hip hop was not an influence for the album?) and "incorporates retro elements" (pretty sure 1989 was also a retro-styled album, so why highlight this part for Lover only?). HĐ (talk) 06:04, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Plus I don't think past tense is used for the album's musical styles, HĐ (talk) 06:07, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

The leads uses the same vocabulary repeatedly, which is poor writing. "electronic" is vital because critics noticed know dubstep and other electronic sounds influenced the album. And, 1989 has extensive info about it in the lead, unlike Lover. BawinV (talk) 06:09, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Not really per WP:ELEVAR ("annex" is a weird alternative, so I'd suggest "blend" or "juxtapose"). Your assessment of "electronic" is rather subjective because reviews from i.e. AllMusic and Spin emphasized pop and rock, while dubstep is only on one track that is "I Knew You Were Trouble", HĐ (talk) 06:18, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

agreed with "blend". and not agreed with the rest, because critics did point out the electronic influences in "we are never getting..." and "22". Pop has already been mentioned as Swift's style, saying it again is repetitive. However, we can emphasize the actual sound by accurately describing it as "dance-pop, rock, electronic". BawinV (talk) 06:24, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Fair enough, I'll leave it to that, HĐ (talk) 06:31, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Actually, you're right. I reverted it back to just pop, dropped the "dance-" bit. The electronic remains though. Thanks. BawinV (talk) 06:45, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		A little something for your work on Taylor Swift-related articles. Though you are new here, you are always open-minded and willing to learn, which I really appreciate. Keep up with the enthusiasm and learning, and I hope you could promote some articles to GA or even FA status in the future! HĐ (talk) 16:17, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Oh wow, this is really nice. This means a lot. Thank you so much ♡ BawinV (talk) 16:44, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

The Music Notes sheet music for Exile is not a reliable source for range because it does not differentiate in register for whether it is Taylor Swift or Justin Vernon singing. Music Notes creates reduced simplified arrangements for anyone to sing however it only takes into account the melody and not the harmonies, and as it is only arranged for one singer in the source cited it notates it as staying in the same arrangement which is not what happens in the song itself. Justin Vernon's range in the song goes from Cb2-Bb4 whereas Taylor Swift's is Eb3-Cb5. Chukulem (talk) 13:38, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Page Protection

Hi, if you are able to please can you make the Ariana Grande Wikipedia Page Fully Protected due to excessive vandalism Randomperson7893457 (talk) 09:18, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I wish I could help, but I don't know how to do it. And yes, the article needs to be protected. Hey @HĐ:, can you help please? BawinV (talk) 09:34, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

I think the page is semi-protected now. Would you like to have the page more strongly protected? HĐ (talk) 13:56, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ariana Grande. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Edit-warring —valereee (talk) 11:30, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Ariana Grande. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —valereee (talk) 11:32, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Another thing you need to be careful of is accusing other editors of vandalism. We have a strict definition of vandalism, which is described at WP:VANDALISM. You may disagree with someone, and you may be entirely correct that their edits are no improvements, but to accuse them of vandalism is to say that they are intentionally and knowingly doing harm to the article - that is an accusation of bad faith, and unless it is backed up with some very convincing evidence it is a personal attack. I deal with vandalism every day, from the insertion of racist abuse or pornographic images intended to shock and offend, to the introduction of subtle inaccuracies to sourced data, intended to make our articles less accurate and thus harm the project - these are vandalism. How information is presented, or which words we use in an article, are not vandalism, should not be treated as such, and are not amongst the exceptions listed at WP:3RRNO. In my opinion, both you and the editor you reported should to try and up your games with regard to collegiality. Best GirthSummit _(blether) 11:45, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The 1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The National.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

A little help please

Hey Bawin! Considering we’ve helped each other before, I would like to request your help again! If you could look at the IP user 71.234.178.78 (talk · contribs), they keep reverting my edits to their talk page about the "Old Warnings" template. I would like to report them as they are constantly bending that rule. Could you please help with this? I don’t know how to report as I’ve never done it. Please see their talk page history and go from there, you’ll know why I’m fed up. Thanks so much!!! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 16:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Also: I would resolve it on their talk page, but they’ll just revert my edit anyways, so what’s the point? D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 16:10, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

@Doggy54321: Hey, friend! Yes I saw it. And yes, I understand your frustration. They're not supposed to revert old warnings template, but they did. Also, from my experience, it looks like they're a sockpuppet (possibly anonymous Mirrored7?). Have they made disruptive edits/broke the 3RR rule anywhere? if they did, then we can report them. I'm not sure if talk page reverts are report-worthy. Please do ping me know when they break rules on articles, I'd make a report then. Regards. BawinV (talk) 16:17, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Yes they have, on Life Support (Madison Beer album). Now, I also did 4 reverts, but they were to revert unsourced changes they added. They also blocked me from editing their talk page, so I couldn’t resolve in that way either. Do you want to report them? I just got out of a block for reporting another user as I edit warred as well, so for me to report may not be the best idea. I’ll add all the diffs on your talk page right now, as well as all the required info. Thanks so much for helping! P.S. what’s your time zone? I'm UTC-4:00, east coast in North America. I’d like to know as it will help me guess when you will respond. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 17:33, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Diff before all the edit warring: [1]

Diffs of edit warring: [2], [3], [4], [5]

I realized that they didn’t ask me not to post on their talk page so I warned them here [6]

Diff of talk page resolve attempt [7]

Please say in the comments section that you’re doing this on behalf of me, and that I was not engaging in an edit war per WP:EW, it says "Removing contentious material that is libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced" does not count as edit warring.

Please also ping me in your report somewhere, as I would like to add comments later on. Thanks so much! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 17:49, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Sure, I'll make the report. BawinV (talk) 19:00, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks so much!!!! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 19:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

By the way, I'm UTC+05:30, India. BawinV (talk) 19:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Hey Bawin! Thanks so much for all you did. I did get blocked, but that’s because I misread the rules. I have about a million changes to review and vandalism to revert, but I just wanted to thank you as soon as I got unblocked. I hope we can continue to be friends, if you need anything just go to my talk page! Thanks so much! (Thanks for the time zone as well, have a good sleep!) D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 19:31, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Aww that's sad you got blocked. But everything is a lesson isn't it? now that we can resolve conflicts more efficiently and take matters directly to admins. And don't mention, it's my pleasure to help you!! Feel free to use my talk page too 💗 Hope you are having a great day! Regards. BawinV (talk) 20:32, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Definitely! Thanks for the offer! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 20:37, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Folklore (Taylor Swift album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nashville tuning.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Trillfendi (talk) 20:07, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Life Support, again

Hey Bawin. I am writing to let you know that there is an IP editor on Life Support (Madison Beer album) that thinks they know better than everyone and thinks they are exempt from citing sources, as they keep adding unsourced info to the article. I have already reverted 2 times and don’t feel like starting an edit war, could you please go ahead and revert their edit? I will be conversing with them on their talk page. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 18:16, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Sure! BawinV (talk) 18:35, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks!! If you could remove the whole tracklist as it’s all unsourced, that would be awesome. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 18:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Yeah I did that! BawinV (talk) 18:39, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

AHHHHH OMGGGGGGGGG. All the IPs except one on the page are one person. They are a sock from Massecheusets (I can’t spell), they all have the same country, city and all have the same postal code. Also known as: we can file an SPI and a edit warring. Wow. If you could kindly revert their edit one more time (I am at three reverts and do not need to be blocked for a third time in three weeks), I’ll file a SPI and an edit warring notice on the notice board. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 21:04, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

SPI and edit warring noticeboard links. Have a great sleep! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 22:36, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! BawinV (talk) 04:18, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

I am at three reverts at that article too! I had had to revert two other edits to revert the "track listing". Please proceed with the SPI and edit war notice. The wrong version of the article can be fixed later, no hurry! BawinV (talk) 04:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Update: The page was protected, so the ANEW report was closed. An admin reverted the disruptive edits before protecting the page, and no progress has been made on the SPI. Thanks for helping! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 10:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Don't mention, you're welcome! 💗 BawinV (talk) 13:54, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Album of the Year

A discussion has begun at WP:RSN regarding the website should be count as an unreliable source and should be remove off the ratings template. Please add your comments there if interested. – TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 01:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello

Hey nice to meet you just kidding Chloemimi (talk) 17:25, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

um, how can I help you? BawinV (talk) 17:46, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Here's a barnstar!

		The Minor Barnstar
		Thanks for this edit. I have been trying to figure out how to reword this for a good five days, but I never changed it 😂😂. Keep working hard! D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 18:19, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Haha! 😂😩 Thanks buddy! Appreciate it 💗 BawinV (talk) 18:23, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi!

I just want to say hi i saw you edit alot on taylor's wikipedia pages and i want to help out so let me know if i can help :) Starbuckslovers (talk) 21:10, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Folklore album

This is Taylors fourth album of the year nomination at the grammys, not the fifth (Fearless, Red, 1989 were the other 3 albums to be nominated) - please edit. Also it's former and latter not earlier and latter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.71.102.130 (talk) 23:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ANI

Hey Bawin. Mirrored7 is at it again. They are edit warring (again) on Ariana Grande, about a ponytail. At this point, I’m fed up. They’ve been edit warring, editing with a bias, and just being disrespectful in general. They’ve received more than enough warnings on their talk page. Therefore, I’m in the process of drafting an ANI about them. I can’t take it anymore. Since October 4th (when I first interacted with them), every interaction with them has been negative. WP:AGF is out the window. Unless there is clear evidence to the contrary, assume that people who work on the project are trying to help it, not hurt it. There’s more than enough evidence. Anyways, have a great day 😁😁! No need to let one little blip ruin your day! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 01:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

@Doggy54321: Yes, exactly! They refuse to learn and their whole atmosphere is negative, creating a bad workspace for us as fellow editors. Please do initiate an ANI, I'd participate in the discussion for sure. This cannot go on forever. Have a great day! Regards. BawinV (talk) 06:33, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Agreed, will do. You too! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 12:37, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Pictures on Billboard chart articles

Hello. I’ve seen you make multiple edit summaries like this, where you allude to a consensus senses regarding what images are placed atop these Billboard chart articles. Can you link me to this consensus? I’m not aware of one existing.

If it exists, please notify the editor youre edit warring with so you can both cut to the chase.

If it doesn’t exist, please start up a centralized discussion about this to create a discernible consensus on it.

Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 21:36, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

@Sergecross73: I studied List of Billboard 200 number-one albums of 2012, List of Billboard 200 number-one albums of 2013, List of Billboard 200 number-one albums of 2014, List of Billboard 200 number-one albums of 2015 and so on; each and every year, the top picture was of the artist who had the *best-selling* album, the picture of the artist who had *best-performing* wasn't the top picture, it was generally the second one. So I assumed this was the consensus. And it makes sense because "best performing" is based on year-end lists which runs from November to November, not a regular calendar year. However best selling albums are of that respective year only. BawinV (talk) 19:24, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

That’s not a consensus. Please start a discussion somewhere, like a music related WikiProject, to get a real consensus. You’re also edit warring on two separate articles currently on this, and you’ve already received a block for edit warring. You are on the thinnest of ice right now. Final warning. If I see any more reverts related to this without a real consensus, you’re going to be blocked again. Sergecross73 msg me 20:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Americana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital FM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Evermore (Taylor Swift album)#Critical reception

The critical reception section is looking GA worthy! Great job (I am In actu) --Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 02:48, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Is it? Thank you so much! Very appreciated 💗 BawinV (talk) 06:28, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

MOS:OVERLINK

Hi Bawin, I came across the evermore article while listening to the album, and first of all, good job building out the content--you've clearly put a lot of work into it. That said, can you read over MOS:OVERLINK and follow that policy in your future edits? Right now the article has wayyy too many links on common words (or duplicate links--you should only link a word once in the body of the article). To use a couple of my edits as examples, all of the links I removed in this edit are common words that do not need to be linked, while the links I removed here were words that had already been linked in the body of the article. There are many more, and it will be a huge help if you can fix that as you continue to make edits. Alyo (chat·edits) 00:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Yes, I'll fix that. Thank you for letting me know. BawinV (talk) 02:05, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Folklore: The Long Pond Studio Sessions

On 17 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Folklore: The Long Pond Studio Sessions, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that having collaborated on the album Folklore months prior, Taylor Swift, Jack Antonoff, and Aaron Dessner met in person for the first time for the filming of Folklore: The Long Pond Studio Sessions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Folklore: The Long Pond Studio Sessions. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Folklore: The Long Pond Studio Sessions), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Wug·a·po·des​ 00:02, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Willow (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Ringer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Taylor Swift Award

	Taylor Swift Award
	Evermore looks amazing. Thank you for everything that you did to expand the article so quickly. -- In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 17:43, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Aw, it's just my hobby! Thank you so much for the appreciation that you show me! Have a nice day! BawinV (talk) 17:46, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Taylor Swift articles

Hi, it seems that you've created quite a few Taylor Swift-related articles potential for GA. Have you considered nominating some of them in the future? I think (some, but not all) articles like Betty (Taylor Swift song) or Cardigan can be likely GAs, HĐ (talk) 04:31, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

@HĐ: Well, I don't how to nominate something for a GA. Can you drop here the links to the procedure, please? I'll learn. BawinV (talk) 04:59, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

It's Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions#Nominating. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 05:21, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank You! On it. BawinV (talk) 19:02, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		I can't even comprehend how you manage to write so much of an article in so little time. I'm in awe every time I see your contributions. Keep up the fantastic work! D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 17:59, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you so much! I appreciate this very much. This is such a nice gesture. BawinV (talk) 18:37, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

You're welcome ! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 18:38, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marjorie (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital FM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello BawinV, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, D🎅ggy54321 (ho-ho-ho) 14:08, 25 December 2020 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

D🎅ggy54321 ^(ho-ho-ho) 14:08, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

BawinV,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! D🎉ggy54321 ^{(happy new year!)} 02:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

---

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year!

BawinV,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! BillieLiz (talk) 05:17, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

---

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Anthony Fantano

A RfC has begun at WP:RSN regarding Anthony Fantano's reviews should be count as reliable. Please add your comments there if interested. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 02:18, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Evermore (Taylor Swift album)

On 6 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Evermore (Taylor Swift album), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Taylor Swift offered to postpone the release date of Evermore by one week so as not to coincide with Paul McCartney's McCartney III? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Evermore (Taylor Swift album). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Evermore (Taylor Swift album)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Audio samples

Hello! I noticed you added an audio file to Drivers License (song) (thank you for your wonderful contributions, by the way); I've uploaded some files in the past, but I'm struggling on how to capture high-quality recordings, similar to the samples offered on say, iTunes, and I was wondering if you could perhaps briefly explain how to do so? If not, it's fine; I understand that this is an incredibly random request, thank you!--Bettydaisies (talk) 03:10, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

@Bettydaisies: Hi! I don't understand what do you mean by "high quality" files! But I generally convert a mp3 file into an ogg file before uploading it to Wikipedia. Ogg offers more quality at 128 kbps. You can simply use an ogg converter (website/app) to perform the action! BawinV (talk) 05:08, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi! I was struggling with some of the audio sounding "echoey" but converting them to ogg helped a lot! Thank you so much.--Bettydaisies (talk) 02:38, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Since I have to.

@MaranoFan:, It's funny that you consider your own diffs as "false narrative". I was collecting the diffs everytime you violate WP:HOUNDING, WP:NPA, and WP:APR. Editors do that when they have to present facts at a dispute. That is nothing new. Like you state here, I will also continue to edit "Drivers License" (by abiding WP:NPA, unlike you). Regards. BawinV (talk) 14:36, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Willow (song)

On 13 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Willow (song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the music video for Taylor Swift's single "Willow" avoids showing some dancers' faces because they were wearing masks as a COVID-19 precaution? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Willow (song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Willow (song)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:02, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

WikiLove

Hello BawinV, Doggy54321 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I can’t comprehend how you manage to add so much information to articles, like you did at De Una Vez. You truly are a god. I really appreciate all you do for Wikipedia. D🎊ggy54321 ^{(happy 20 years of Wikipedia!!)} 14:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

@Doggy54321: Omg haha! Thank you so much! BawinV (talk) 15:26, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

No problem! Keep being awesome! D🎊ggy54321 ^{(happy 20 years of Wikipedia!!)} 17:29, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Marjorie (song)

On 16 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Marjorie (song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Taylor Swift's 2020 song "Marjorie" has been described as "a heart-rending tribute" to her grandmother, opera singer Marjorie Finlay, who inspired Swift's musical career? You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Marjorie (song)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Evermore

Hey Bawin! I was looking through the page history for Evermore (Taylor Swift album) and noticed that you "broke" 3RR in the past 24h. 1 2 3 4. Now, you didn’t actually break it, because 1 was unknowingly reverting a sockpuppet/vandal. Please see User:Nkon21/sandbox3 for more info. Nkon21 and I are working on filing an LTA report against them (see discussion here). So, in case anyone makes a report at WP:AN3, now you have this counter-argument. Now, I’m not gonna go report you because you didn’t actually break 3RR, but I’m just saying if someone looks through the page and if someone reports to AN3, you have a counter-point now. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 12:46, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

@Doggy54321: Yes I'm aware of that. Thank You! I reverted Mirrored thrice and then gave them a warning, after which I stopped acting on them and let the wrong version exist. And my fourth revert was a vandal, yep. BawinV (talk) 13:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Ok, cool. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 14:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

@Doggy54321: Thanks again! I appreciate you caring about it 💗 BawinV (talk) 14:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

No problem!! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 17:00, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Betty (Taylor Swift song)

added a link pointing to Under the Radar

Folklore (Taylor Swift album)

added a link pointing to Under the Radar

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Regarding Drivers License

I have no idea how to reply, feel free to instruct me. I'm probably doing this wrong, I am sorry.

So, Drivers License. I don't believe the source meant to intentionally label it as power pop music. It was misinterpreted.

Rather was simply describing the song as a power ballad that was pop. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentimental_ballad#Power_ballads

Please check out the following if you want to better understand power pop. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_pop

Phantavius (talk) 11:47, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

@Phantavius: There are sources that call it "power ballad". So no, there's a clear distinction between the two. I suggest you don't assume yourself as smarter than a music critic/publication. If the source wanted to say power ballad, then they would've said power ballad; however, the source explicitly calls the song "power pop" ballad. If I were to make a personal comment, it'd be great if you read the Wikipedia articles you cited to me yourself, because a genre is not only a sound but also a style and trope. As an editor, you're obliged to follow WP:OR. You should not conjure your own theories about what the source's author might have meant. We add the genres to songs based on critical reviews only. Your "source is wrong" concern is typical of a genre warrior. So I advice you don't! Good day BawinV (talk) 11:58, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Valentine Greets!!!

Valentine Greets!!!

Hello BawinV, love is the language of hearts and is the feeling that joins two souls and brings two hearts together in a bond. Taking love to the level of Wikipedia, spread the WikiLove by wishing each other Happy Valentine's Day, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm love on the eve, Happy editing, D💘ggy54321 (xoxo😘) 03:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Valentine Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Thank You! 💗 BawinV (talk) 08:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

My pleasure! D💘ggy54321 ^(xoxo😘) 13:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Taylor Swift - Folklore (Target Exclusive).png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Taylor Swift - Folklore (Target Exclusive).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. HĐ (talk) 04:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Miss Americana

added a link pointing to Vanity Fair

Only the Young (Taylor Swift song)

added a link pointing to Vanity Fair

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

August (Taylor Swift song)

Hello, just to let you know I have expanded the article. Just a small request, do you have access to the album liner notes? The article is lacking a Credits and personnel section. If you do, could you add the missing section? Thank you very much! HĐ (talk) 17:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Disregard what I said, I found the credits on Pitchfork. Have a great day! HĐ (talk) 17:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Ah cool! BawinV (talk) 17:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi BawinV. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2021-03-21. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! — Newslinger talk 20:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi BawinV, let's do a one-month trial. Your editing history is generally fine, with the exception of one block for edit warring within the last six months. Please practice counter-vandalism with rollback over the next month and take care not to rollback edits in violation of WP:ROLLBACKUSE. When the permission is about to expire, please submit another request here to have it instated permanently. Keep up the good work. — Newslinger talk 20:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank You! BawinV (talk) 05:11, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

@Newslinger: Hi. The 1-month trial is over. Can I be given the rollback rights permanently? BawinV (talk) 14:07, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi BawinV, your 8 uses of rollback in the past month look fine. Thank you for promptly correcting the one mistake in Special:Diff/1010951556 by reversing it in Special:Diff/1010951889. Your rollback permission is now indefinite. Keep up the good work. — Newslinger talk 05:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. I will. BawinV (talk) 06:09, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello

Hi there BawinV - not sure of the best way to go about this, so apologies in advance if I'm getting it all wrong! I'm writing an article about superfans who help to maintain pop stars' wikipedia pages and would love to speak with you about the work you're doing. Let me know the best way to get in touch? Happy to share my contact details with you privately if that suits you. WFP.wiki (talk) 17:06, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Anything you want to talk about, please talk to me here. I'm not interested in sharing my personal contact info. Regards. BawinV (talk) 17:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Marjorie song for GA status

I was considering nominating "Marjorie" for good article status. Do you have any thoughts or interest in doing a co-nomination? I'd love to collaborate. TJMSmith (talk) 12:35, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

@TJMSmith: Sure, I'm in! Thank You. BawinV (talk) 14:44, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Long Pond Studio.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Long Pond Studio.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 20:17, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Removal

Hi BawinV, you have removed some information from the impact section of Fearless (Taylor's Version) and just stated that your reason is "trim", which makes me confused. Why did you remove a lot of information that I added when they are all backed up with reliable sources? I also noticed that a lot of time when a section is fully detailed with reliable sources and then you removed a lot of them and just stated that you're trimming the section, such as in the Folklore (Taylor Swift album) or Evermore (Taylor Swift album) article. Can you explain to me why did you do that? Thanks, ADTN1210 (let's talk) 15:12, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

@ADTN1210: Hi, Wikipedia appreciates your work. Thank You. However, Daily Trojan is not a music publication or a mainstream publication. It's a newspaper written by university students. "Impact" should be extracted from important publications like the ones you added next, The New Yorker, Stereogum etc. Regards. BawinV (talk) 20:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

AKL

Dear praxidicae and BawinV,

While reverting back edits made by the unknown IP addr in the AKL, it is seen that the older version of the page is being restored and real updates made by BawinV, and me ( Added new ref, updates for OMP and Loner Music videos ) are lost in the process. Can both of you please review the version made @ 00:25 on May 1. If found to be satisfactory, can we please get back those changes. Appreciate your help.

Thank you so much Adapongaiya (talk) 16:00, 1 May 2021 (UTC).

@Adapongaiya: which edit are you talking about? BawinV (talk) 17:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

BawinV, you had made some fixes in awards section and corrected intro in the page AKL, on top of which I had made edits for new Ref # 2, OMP & Loner, Now in the version restored, those changes are gone Adapongaiya (talk) 18:58, 1 May 2021 (UTC).

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WION.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Willow (song) for GA status

Hey Bawin! I was thinking of nominating Willow (song) for GA status, but I noticed that you and I are first and second on the Authorship (character count) section on XTools, so I wanted to ask if you would do a co-nomination with me, since both of us are significant contributors. If you would like to, please respond so we can start coordinating who would do what! If you don't want to, I can do it by myself. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 13:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

@Doggy54321: Hey! The thing is, I have never nominated anything for GA or FA, and I've been reluctant to do it because it looks like lots of work, which I don't have the time for, currently. But if you think it's easy, then I'm ready to help you for sure. BawinV (talk) 22:31, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Awesome, I'll prep (copyedit, general fixes, etc to the best of my abilities) the article, and you can do the same if you want, before nominating, to give the article its best chance at passing. The process honestly way easier than it seems. I nominated The Man (Taylor Swift song) for GA status a couple months ago, and, as you can see at Talk:The Man (Taylor Swift song)/GA1, the article was in good enough condition that the nomination was placed on hold, and I was given a to-do list to bring the article up to GA status. It was mostly grammatical errors and other copy-editing, but I did have to find sources for a couple things, which was the hardest part, especially since the song's release was a year ago. With "Willow", its release was only a couple months ago, so it should be easier to find sources for anything we need to find sources for. And, the best part about a co-nomination is that, if you need to, there is another editor to lean on. But, if you have any doubts, I don't want to pressure you into doing something you're not interested in. I suggest reading WP:GA and all the associated pages listed in the banner before making a final decision, as that explains the whole process. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 22:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

@Doggy54321: Thank You! I'll read them. And yes, we should co-nominate the article. I am indeed interested. I'll c/e the article as well. BawinV (talk) 06:21, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Cool! After we wrap up copyediting, I can officially nominate the article, and add you as a co-nominator. Update: I am now done copyediting. If you could let me know when you are done, that would be great as I would then officially nominate the article to get the ball rolling. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 11:57, 6 May 2021 (UTC) (updated 00:43, 7 May 2021 (UTC))

@Doggy54321: Yes, I'll let you know. Please give me few hours. BawinV (talk) 05:04, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

@Doggy54321: Hey, I went through the article. Thanks to you, everything looks fine. I think we can nominate it now. BawinV (talk) 07:50, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Great! I'll nominate the article. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 12:14, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Done and done. Now we wait. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 12:18, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

@Doggy54321: Hi! I'm wondering what happened to our Willow GA nomination? BawinV (talk) 15:15, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi! I nominated the article about four weeks ago, but the reviews usually take a bit of time to get started. Considering that there are currently 419 nominations waiting to be started, it might take a while. We should both get a bot message when the review is started. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 16:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

@Doggy54321: Noted! Thank you and have a nice day. BawinV (talk) 17:09, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

You too :) D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 18:42, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Tamildau assembly election result 2021

Hi

Hw ar u??

have you any issue in adding 3rd party tamilnadu assembly election results 2021 Nuf1232wkd (talk) 12:24, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

It won nothing. You can't add it. BawinV (talk) 19:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Folklore and "electroacoustic"

Again, these references are general descriptors and they don't match the actual academic style of electroacoustic music. It's like if some album by Arca had a couple of references to it having a "hardcore sound" and we tagged it as hardcore (or worse, as hardcore punk). Or if we linked Romanticism whenever someone mentioned some piece of media is "romantic".

Should we perhaps have an article for this other less strict application of the name? Yes, perhaps. But I don't think applying a bit of informed discerning is original research. --181.115.61.86 (talk) 03:28, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

@181.115.61.86: All I'm asking you is to please stick to the sources. I don't have to counter your argument, but I'm doing to do it anyway. (a) "these references are general descriptors and they don't match the actual academic style of electroacoustic music" is your opinion. You're not a critic from a reliable publication. You're only a editor on Wikipedia. We editors are supposed to extract data from sources alone, not add our own opinions and comments. (b) You cannot interpret what the critic/writer "meant" just because you don't agree. Read WP:GENRE. Editors don't get to decide what is meant/implied. (c) If a critic(s) says an Arca album is hardcore, then we shall tag the album as hardcore, and yet again you're only upholding your personal opinions over reliable sources, which Wikipedia does not recommend you to do while editing articles. (d) "Romanticism" isn't linked whenever something is called romantic. Romanticism is linked only when a critic explicitly spells out the entire word "Romanticism" in their review to describe the music/lyrics/artwork. (e) As per WP:GENRE, when source(s) explicitly call an album a genre, then it shall be listed as the concerned music's genre in Wikipedia. As far as Folklore is concerned, two publications (which is more than enough) call the album's style electroacoustic, with many other critics underlining the combination of both electro and acoustic elements in the album's sound. Regards. BawinV (talk) 06:50, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Taylor Swift BRITs image

Please don't assume that someone removes an image for copyvio just because an uploader has falsely claimed it as their own work; if you'd bothered to check the YouTube link like I already had you'd have noticed it is not licensed. Cleaning up a credit/license template in a commons file means nothing when there's no commons license in the first place. Kingsif (talk) 00:07, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

@Kingsif: I must have not made the edit as someone who isn't very experienced with copyvio; I thought I'd be bold. Anyways, thank you. I will be more careful next time. BawinV (talk) 04:36, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Beyoncé

Hi BawinV! You and I were both involved in this discussion regarding which of Beyoncé's professions to include. It turns out DDTN49 was a sockpuppet account. My inclination is to remove the section with an edit summary explaining why, but I would not do so without your permission. Do I have it? Firefangledfeathers (talk) 03:30, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

@Firefangledfeathers: Yes, you have my permission. BawinV (talk) 12:23, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vevo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Me.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Template:Folklore (Taylor Swift album) tracks

Hi! Just so you know, I have removed all usage of the template you created ({{Folklore (Taylor Swift album) tracks}}). I forget exactly where I saw this, but I remember seeing something that said if there's a navbox at the end of the article, you can't use a "tracks" template in the Infobox. Since {{Taylor Swift songs}} is used at the end of all the pages for the Folklore songs, this template can't be used, and therefore has no purpose (which is why it was deleted a month ago). Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 12:34, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Per Template:Infobox song#Track listing examples, An album track listing may be added to infobox song as long as the following criteria are met: 1) the article does not have a navbox in which the song appears; and 2) a majority of the album's songs are linked to WP articles. For Folklore, criterion #2 is met (most of the songs have articles by now), but criterion #1 is not met, as {{Taylor Swift songs}}, a navbox, is at the end of every article. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 12:37, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

@Doggy54321: Understood. Thank You. BawinV (talk) 13:42, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

You're welcome D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 15:36, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Please, accept some falafel!

You deserve it. 🐐 Dondawithchild (talk) 18:31, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank You! BawinV (talk) 19:52, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

TUN

Hi! I'm still generally new to Wikipedia and I was wondering when the Thank U, Next album's page would start allowing me to edit it. I don't why it's been protected for so long since it's just an album page.

Thanks for your time Blowscalls (talk) 17:37, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

@Blowscalls: That article has been granted indefinite auto-confirmed user protection due to persistent sockpuppetry. The move was performed by RoySmith. Please contact them. Regards. BawinV (talk) 17:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)