Bastien Sens-Méyé~enwiki

Hello, Bastien Sens-Méyé! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! DVdm (talk) 09:25, 3 October 2011 (UTC) Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your edits

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Minkowski space, but we cannot accept original research. Please do not add your home made animations of images to various articles. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 09:25, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

I second that. Your edits are not desirable; please do not continue to make such changes withotu first establishing consensus for them. --Stemonitis (talk) 10:11, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Ok, I wish a consensus with you :). A discuss about it. My purpose is only to make it possible wikipedia to profit from all the technological advantages which make it possible a numerical encyclopaedia to exist. Namely: interactivity, user-friendliness, esthetics. When it is said to me that an encyclopaedia could not be a “ludic course”, I argue that the austerity does not support “the intellectual awakening” (if you allow me this phrase). Perhaps in addition, to support user-friendliness will allow wikipedia more frequentation. Best Reguards :)--Bastien Sens-Méyé (discuss) 10:11, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

I'm afraid I don't understand a word of that. Whay are you trying to say? --Stemonitis (talk) 10:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Don't be afraid, my friend. I am a human been :)). I just want to explain that it is possible to have more interactivity with these kind of app'. But is it possible to discuss together about it with an administrator of en.wikipedia? Have fun! :)--Bastien Sens-Méyé (discuss) 10:11, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Your addition to Spider-Man

Hello,

I have re-reverted your addition to this article. The Did You Know topic is irrelevant to the article subject, the animation is distracting and the addition of such material is unencyclopedic. It might maybe find a home as part of a Wikiquiz, but not here. Yunshui (talk) 10:30, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your message :) My idea is to discuss about this app'. I think that wikipedia would be more insteresting with it. Best reguards! Bastien Sens-Méyé (talk) 10:30, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

I would suggest opening a discussion at the village pump, in that case. Yunshui (talk) 10:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Ok ;) I opened a discuss about it to there : [1]. I hope that it is good to :) Thank you my friend ! Bastien Sens-Méyé (talk) 10:42, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Excuse me, but, could you explain me how to use the village pump? Sorry °_° Bastien Sens-Méyé (talk) 10:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

I suggest starting a new topic here at the Village Pump. The Administrators' Noticeboard is not the right place for it. Until you get some agreement from others in this animation, I strongly suggest that you DON'T use it any more in articles. As far as I can see it hasn't been welcomed in articles where you have placed it, and I agree with other editors that it's distracting. Please do wait for feedback from others before implementing it further. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 11:32, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your answer, my friend! I hope you will participate to this discuss on the link that you send to me. Best reguards! Bastien Sens-Méyé discuss 13:55, 3 october 2011 (CEST)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:06, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

The "Did you know?" gif/image

Hi Bastien,

The objection to your insertion of these boxes is not soley on the grounds of the annoying .gif animation (although it was pretty seizure-inducing). Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an online quiz, and these additions are inappropriate. We already have a project for Wikiquizzes, and your efforts might be more appreciated there. In article space, however, I can't see that they would ever gain consensus for use. Yunshui (talk) 10:28, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

		Civility Award
		I reckon you merit one of these, though - a lot of editors would have raised merry hell over the criticism of their pet project, but you've been very polite throughout the whole debacle. Yunshui (talk) 10:32, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Fully agreeing with Yunshui's barnstar. I hope Bastien that you are not doscouraged by the reception of your animation and that you can bring the same enthusiasm and ingenuity to some of the ongoing projects we have here. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 10:40, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Wholeheartedly agree as well. Chapeau! DVdm (talk) 11:35, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you infinitely for your messages, my friends! I wish you an excellent evening, and, i promise you, I would try to find more interesting ideas ; ans shall speak about them! Best reguards and thank you again! Bastien Sens-Méyé (discuss) 20:01, 4 October 2011 (CEST)

New York City draft riots

Hi. I am not sure why you wiki-linked dates/years on the New York City draft riots article but that is rarely done (see WP:MOS). Yours, Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 14:11, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello! I usaly post on wikipedia french. It is habitualy done in this language because more conections and it is better for wiki. Wish you have a very good evening. Thank you for your message! Bye!Bastien Sens-Méyé (talk) 16:11515 October 2011 (CEST)

On our wiki linking dates and years is not done, unless in very specific instances. See wp:OVERLINK and wp:OVERLINK#Chronological items. I have just undone most of your recent link additions. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 15:11, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

It's okay! Have à very good evening! Cheers. Bastien Sens-Méyé (talk) 23:11 11 October 2011 (CEST)

External links

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Michel Farinet do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 21:25, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi Bastien,

I don't entirely agree with DVdm here. I don't read French too well, so I'm not entirely certain of what these links say, but it could be that some of these links might useable as references for the article. Certainly Le Post looks as though it would make a valid source. I haven't reverted DVdm's edit, but you might want to take another look at the page and see if some of those links could be added back in. You're far more bilingual than I am, so you're in a better position to establish whether or not they should be used. Have a look at WP:RS for the English Wikipedia's guidlines for sources (I think some of these may fall under the subsection WP:USERG), and see if you think any of them could be put back in as references - use the instructions at WP:INCITE to place them as inline citations.

It may be that they all fail the requirements of WP:RS, in which case I guess DVdm was right, but I think some of them may bear a second look. Since the article is tagged for lacking sources, more inline citations would be an improvement. Give me a shout on my talkpage if you need a hand.

Cheers, Yunshui (talk) 07:39, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi there, Bastien and Yunshui, here's the items at wp:ELNO w.r.t. the individual sources:

• Discography ==> #1, #11 (blog), #13
• Press : agoravox (fr) ==> #1, #11 (blog), #13
• Press : RTL (fr) ==> #1, #13
• Press : Le Post (fr) ==> #1, #11 (blog), #13
• Press : Paperblog (fr) ==> ==> #1, #11 (blog), #13

Hope this helps. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 08:42, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Looks like DVdm's pretty much got it covered. In respect of the above, I reckon his revert looks like a good call after all. I thought Le Post was a NEWSBLOG, but it isn't. Sorry for the extra work, DV. Yunshui (talk) 08:50, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

No problem. I had done the work already :-) - Cheers - DVdm (talk) 08:54, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Bastien Sens-Méyé. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Bastien Sens-Méyé~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

22:30, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

10:55, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Michel Farinet for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michel Farinet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michel Farinet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

—S Marshall T/C 12:32, 3 March 2022 (UTC)