Baramop (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I provided evidence of a pattern of abusive, anti-Semitic editing. This block is without merit
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:55, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Baramop (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I will refrain from characterizing the content added by LB as AS. Given that I and another user were falsely accused of sockpuppetry. The CheckUser shows I have no connection to Zeke so, again, this account should be unblocked.
Decline reason:
Nothing false about the accusation concerning you. Tunop has been proven to be yours and the close geolocation combined with a tight article grouping suggests that more probable than naught that meatpuppetry at the least has been going on if not outright socking.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 23:15, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Baramop (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This block is punitive retaliation. The CheckUser showed this account and the other, Zeke account, are unrelated. 'Floquenbeam' is not a neutral observer here. He/she is consciously mischaracterizing the CheckUser. A neutral observer can read the CheckUser here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Zeke1999
Decline reason:
The CU did not show that you were unrelated. It showed you were possibly related, and behavioral comparison showed that you were related. Also it doesn't matter how "beyond critique" your edits as Tunop were - sockpuppetry is against policy, and regardless of the merits of a block, so is block evasion. Given all of this and the behavior that led to the block in the first place I don't see how it would be to the benefit of the community for you to be unblocked. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:11, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.