Bankabobeka

May 2017 edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago9 comments6 people in discussion

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Xiaomi. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. <link removed> - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 10:03, 17 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Top 20 Countdown: Most Shocking. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 10:04, 17 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Breaking news. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 10:08, 17 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 10:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bankabobeka (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here respected sir i really don't know how to add wikilinks sorry sir but my website not gaining any views, some one said that add wikilinks they work like backlinks so i added links now i'm in trouble, please sir sorry for what i have done, i didn't add any thing in the future sorry for the trouble faced from me im really very very sorry. please don't do anything to my website, my website is only source to my food one second really very very sorry i respect wiki, i never come back again sir please unblock me

Decline reason:

If you would like to edit Wikipedia on topics other than your company, you are very welcome to do so. However, as Boing! said Zebedee has explained below, we need to be certain that allowing you to edit would be the best thing for Wikipedia. In order for us to assess this, you need to explain what you intend to edit if you are unblocked. Yunshui ^雲 _水 14:48, 17 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Firstly, don't panic - nobody is going to do anything to your website! All we are interested in here is whether unblocking you would be beneficial to building our encyclopedia. Now, your request seems a little confused in that you say you will "never come back again" but still ask for an unblock. If you do not intend to come back, you do not need to be unblocked - just walk away from this account, and it will all be forgotten. If you do want to contribute, you would need to tell us what you want to do here if unblocked. So please decide whether or not you wish to continue here, and if you do then please explain how you would contribute. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:46, 17 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

thank u so much for u kind words i afraid a lot, if u unblock me i contribute wiki in the future not now because i'm just learning how to edit and how to write, so i'm in learning stage may be some days later when i feel perfect for contributing then i will do, but now unblock me sir— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bankabobeka (talk • contribs)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bankabobeka (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

oh god! why guys so serious about me i did mistake i agree, now i know all about wikipedia guidelines, here one message showing if u request to many unblocking request ur blocked from edit this, so this my last request and i'm begging u, why so serious about me, love you guys please please unblock me, in the future u will see i will contribute well, don't decline, feel like i'm ur little brother, one second sorry for what i have done, i'm hoping a good reply, don't decline, don't decline, plz plz plz... Trust Me i will contribute well, i will never make a mistake again, please remove that spam link above pointing to my website

Decline reason:

You were asked what edits you would make if unblocked, and you have refused to answer. As such, I'm declining your unblock request. Yamla (talk) 11:34, 18 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've removed the link to your website. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:09, 18 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bankabobeka (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i will edit any small changes that were incorrect and if any article that needs more info, but not now may be in the future, i don't want to create another account thats why i'm asking to unblock me, any way u missed a good boy,bye bye... Note: i said so much sorry's and i begged,

Decline reason:

If you don't intend to edit now, you don't need to be unblocked now. Creating another account, however, would be block evasion and would see that other account blocked too. Huon (talk) 20:24, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Add topic