Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruno Colmant (October 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 02:57, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, BadrBoussabat! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 02:57, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Bruno Colmant has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bruno Colmant. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:05, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

October 2018

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Teahouse, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button   located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:43, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi BadrBoussabat! You created a thread called Question - Publication (article) at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 20 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruno Colmant has been accepted

edit
 
Bruno Colmant, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 12:42, 17 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Bruno Colmant

edit

Hello, BadrBoussabat,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Bruno Colmant should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruno Colmant .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

scope_creepTalk 13:30, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Bruno Colmant

edit

Hello,

Actually I didn’t request the deletion. I don’t want to delete the page. I want to keep it. Would you mind keeping it please ?

Thank you very much,

Sincerely yours,

Badr BadrBoussabat (talk) 13:34, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Are you a paid editor with a conflict of interest?

edit
 

Hello BadrBoussabat. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:BadrBoussabat. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=BadrBoussabat|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)Reply