Walter Duranty

edit

If you wish to make controversial changes to the Walter Duranty article, you need to discuss them first. Beyond that, you need to stop removing content from that article that you politically disagree with (such as the prize controversy). The edit war going on in the article is not productive for anyone. You need to either convince others of the changes or create compromise text that everyone can agree to. 12.96.162.45 19:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please discuss your changes. I have written extensive feedback on your changes at the Walter Duranty article and I have left you a note here. In response you have simply added your changes yet another time to the Walter Duranty article after which they were reverted again.

Your current behavior is not acceptable. As an example, you are removing valid content from the article. Example - "Several organizations have called on the Pulitzer Board to revoke his prize, but in 2003 the Board issued a statement announcing its decision not to revoke the prize."

There is no factual or POV basis for removing the statement. If you remove factual content without explaination, that is not acceptable. If you continue to attempt to remove those statements without explaination, it will be considered vandalism.12.96.162.45 20:32, 2 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Vladimir Lenin

edit

  Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia. If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TheQuandry 19:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

You should follow your own advice. You have twice deleted sourced material which I've added. Backdash 19:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Please stop being uncivil to your fellow editors; instead, assume that they are here to improve Wikipedia. Thank you. TheQuandry 20:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

You Nazi Pig

edit

Backdash, you're a Nazi bigot. Now kindly shut the fuck up. Israel has a God given right to defend itself against terrorist, raghead, sand monkey, subhuman pieces of shit. Don't like it? Tough, Adolf. On what part of your anatomy is your swastika tattoo? 76.21.45.13 09:07, 4 March 2007 (UTC) Hezbollah is unquestionably a terrorist organization. It's not even debatable. Just shut the fuck up. You don't know about what you are talking. Now eat shit. 76.21.45.13 09:07, 4 March 2007 (UTC)Reply