User talk:BMA-Nation2020/Archive 1

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Trivialist in topic July 2022

Welcome edit

Hello, BMA-Nation2020, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 19:28, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rock of Ages 3: Make & Break has been accepted edit

 
Rock of Ages 3: Make & Break, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:55, 6 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

July 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm Ken Tony. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Boss Baby: Back in Business, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ken Tony Shall we discuss? 06:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

BMA-Nation2020, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi BMA-Nation2020! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Eternal Cylinder (July 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:27, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Jellyfish Pictures moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Jellyfish Pictures, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 03:14, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jellyfish Pictures (July 13) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:53, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Eternal Cylinder (July 13) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:57, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jellyfish Pictures (July 13) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pahunkat was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Pahunkat (talk) 15:28, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jellyfish Pictures (July 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qwerfjkl was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Qwerfjkltalk 10:47, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jellyfish Pictures (July 31) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AntanO was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AntanO 18:25, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jellyfish Pictures (August 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
• Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 3 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amie Doherty (August 16) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul W was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Paul W (talk) 12:09, 16 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Psychonauts (franchise) (August 25) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-Liancetalk/contribs 00:28, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Croods: Family Tree (August 31) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 16:26, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Croods: Family Tree (August 31) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eternal Shadow were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eternal Shadow Talk 21:27, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jellyfish Pictures (September 18) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 17:35, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Croods: Family Tree has been accepted edit

 
The Croods: Family Tree, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 18:03, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

October 2021 edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Inside Job (2021 TV series), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — YoungForever(talk) 19:16, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Santa Inc information you added edit

[1] You claim Stoopid Buddy Studios did the work for them. That isn't listed on their official website nor any news source. Where are you getting this information from? Dream Focus 03:10, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Simple. Seth green and his crew are listed in the credits. They’re from Stoopid Buddy Stoodios. 66.186.255.243 (talk) 04:31, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, forgot to log in. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 04:33, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jellyfish Pictures (December 18) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeromeenriquez was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Jeromeenriquez (talk) 07:20, 18 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robin Robin has been accepted edit

 
Robin Robin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

2pou (talk) 04:05, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alice's Wonderland Bakery (January 7) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 01:22, 7 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:DreamWorks Dragons: The Nine Realms has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:DreamWorks Dragons: The Nine Realms. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:41, 7 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of DreamWorks Dragons: The Nine Realms edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on DreamWorks Dragons: The Nine Realms requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://tabbyspantry.com/dragons/ and devdiscourse.com/article/entertainment/1785556-how-to-train-your-dragon-new-series-to-bring-dragons-to-the-modern-world. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 15:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Psychonauts (franchise) edit

  Hello, BMA-Nation2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Psychonauts (franchise), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amie Doherty (February 18) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Skarmory were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Skarmory (talk • contribs) 05:03, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jellyfish Pictures has been accepted edit

 
Jellyfish Pictures, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Doric Loon (talk) 21:37, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:The Bad Guys Logo.jpeg edit

Thanks for uploading File:The Bad Guys Logo.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:30, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

March 2022 edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Megamind, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:15, 14 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Also, please stop tagging sourced content as needing a citation. This is disruptive; see WP:DISRUPTSIGNS: "Engages in 'disruptive cite-tagging'; adds unjustified {{citation needed}} tags to an article when the content tagged is already sourced, uses such tags to suggest that properly sourced article content is questionable." NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:55, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Do you know DreamWorks doesn’t count as a distribution right? BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 13:04, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Bit of caution edit

Just as a note, you shouldn't move a redirect to start a draft page.. just create a draft page, and when thats ready to go to mainsoace we can then override the redirect. Otherwise you end up creating a redirect from the move that points into draft space which we don't want. (This is with Return to Monkey Island). I've fixed it, just a caution for next time. --Masem (t) 19:28, 4 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

sorry. someone didn't make it right. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 19:30, 4 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pinecone & Pony (April 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pinecone & Pony has been accepted edit

 
Pinecone & Pony, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:43, 11 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Pinecone & Pony edit

Hello, BMA-Nation2020,

Thank you for creating Pinecone & Pony.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add a reception section with details of reviews of the series in reliable sources

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Atlantic306 (talk) 21:50, 11 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Megamind (franchise) has been accepted edit

 
Megamind (franchise), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 12:23, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Megamind (franchise) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Megamind (franchise) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megamind (franchise) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Indagate (talk) 12:30, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marooned (short film) (April 27) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Atlantic306 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Atlantic306 (talk) 23:45, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Megamind has been accepted edit

 
Template:Megamind, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ts12rActalk to me 06:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marooned (short film) (April 28) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 12:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Megamind edit

 Template:Megamind has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Indagate (talk) 19:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Battle at Big Rock into Draft:Amie Doherty. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:31, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Megamind: Mega Team Unite (April 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gpkp was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gpkp [utc] 07:18, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Megamind logo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Megamind logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Megamind: Mega Team Unite (April 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Megamind: Mega Team Unite (April 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:14, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Megamind: Mega Team Unite (May 2) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 10:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Megamind: Mega Team Unite has been accepted edit

 
Megamind: Mega Team Unite, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 22:34, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Murder Drones (May 7) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Gusfriend (talk) 01:16, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Murder Drones (May 7) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RPSkokie was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RPSkokie (talk) 03:32, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spirit: Lucky's Big Adventure (May 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 13:01, 14 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

May 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm Some Dude From North Carolina. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:43, 14 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Actually, it doesn’t need a source. The proof is in the trailer. It’s simliar to the Bad Guys because of it’s style of animation. So there’s no need to remove it. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 23:43, 14 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
That's not how this works. Your claim is that the animation is similar to The Bad Guys and that it was inspired by Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse. You can't just base that off a trailer. Someone from the production has to confirm it. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 04:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amie Doherty has been accepted edit

 
Amie Doherty, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

PK650 (talk) 09:21, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sonic the Hedgehog (film series) (May 24) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SlySabre was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
SlySabre (talk) 12:51, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bad Guys: Episode 1 (May 27) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by I dream of horses were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:11, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:The Bad Guys has been accepted edit

 
Template:The Bad Guys, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:13, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bad Guys: Episode 1 (May 27) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 00:54, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Bad Guys edit

 Template:The Bad Guys has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Indagate (talk) 06:41, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghost Force (May 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 04:38, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steve Mazzaro (June 9) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:59, 9 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, BMA-Nation2020

Thank you for creating Megamind (franchise).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:18, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rabbids Invasion: Mission to Mars (July 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 12:02, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Draft: Rabbids invasion Mission to Mars helping edit

@BMA-Nation2020 Thank you for helping me for my draft! I really appreciate it! Unfortunately the draft was declined a third time for the same reason as the second decline. I also noticed that you helped out and created some drafts as well! The decline reason was: There was not enough secondary sources. Read the most recent comment in the draft for more details. Darienow (talk) 15:30, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I know but you're welcome, man. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 15:48, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

July 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm BangJan1999. I noticed that you recently removed content from Draft:Kung Fu Panda: The Dragon Knight (2) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. BangJan1999 19:27, 12 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at Puss in Boots: The Last Wish shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:29, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

hey, man, how do i clean up this junk you guys left me. i don't feel like having people complaining about my actions anymore. i am following the rules but things get worse every time. so is it okay if i can just delete all of this without having more room to talk about? Like archive it and all? BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 21:14, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Generally, yes. You can find more info at Wikipedia:User pages#Removal of comments, notices, and warnings and Help:Archiving a talk page. Trivialist (talk) 23:48, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
so... which template makes me archive all of this? BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 23:59, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Help:Archiving_a_talk_page#For_talk_pages lists some options. Trivialist (talk) 03:21, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Paws of Fury edit

Hi, please stop removing writers from the Paws of Fury: The Legend of Hank infobox. Those writers are explicitly credited for the story and screenplay. It directly uses a revised version of the Blazing Saddles script, so it's not "based on" Blazing Saddles; it's more like a cover version of a song with a different arrangement. I'm aware that the writers of Blazing Saddles didn't work directly on this film (except maybe for Mel Brooks), but that's not how screenwriting credits work. Because the actual Blazing Saddles screenplay was used, its writers get credited.

Also, the infobox is intended to list basic information, not distinguish when credited individuals worked on a film. That's better dealt with in the article itself. Trivialist (talk) 18:34, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

No! They were not invovled! Those two are only credited for the screenplay, not the ones that used to been invovled. Leave it be and don’t mess it up. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 18:38, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
If you want to complain, do it on this: Talk:Paws of Fury: The Legend of Hank. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 18:40, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Also, please explain your edits instead of just angrily reverting and saying something like "leave it my way!" Trivialist (talk) 19:15, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
It’s better like that for facts. Messing it up makes less sense. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 19:16, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
The infobox is intended to reflect the credits of the film. All of those writers are credited, whether you like it or not. Those are the "facts." Trivialist (talk) 19:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
No it’s not. It just doesn’t make sense. Those two wrote and the film is based on the old screenplay. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 19:19, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
They're literally in the credits. It doesn't matter if anyone other than the studio thinks it makes sense. I don't think it makes sense either, but we don't get to change the credits based on what we think is "right." That's how facts work. Trivialist (talk) 19:24, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
No it’s not! I don’t want no edit wars over me! I have enough of people telling me to stop doing this or that, alright! I don’t want any trouble and i just don’t want people talking to me in my talk page. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 19:25, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Editors are expected to cooperate with each other. This means accepting discussions on your talk page, and, when people tell you "to stop doing this or that," you have to actually consider it instead of editing without disregard for others. If you aren't interested in doing this, Wikipedia probably isn't for you. Trivialist (talk) 19:53, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
i have to fix everything they're misusing. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 19:58, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Please see Wikipedia:Civility. Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 20:02, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply