Muhammad bin Qasim

edit

Maybe you would like to fix up the Muhammad bin Qasim article. It's very bias. --Dangerous-Boy 00:24, 12 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

I know how annoying such pov-warring apologists can be. (One only needs to look at his words on your talk page). But I don't know if I'll have the time to help in this matter. You may find some of the following links useful, as a start: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. --BLeslie 01:31, 12 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Now this guy Street Scholar is screwing with Islamic conquest of South Asia. --Dangerous-Boy 01:17, 13 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of The Calcutta Quran Petition for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Calcutta Quran Petition is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Calcutta Quran Petition until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.   Cs32en Talk to me  12:52, 30 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of The Saffron Swastika for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Saffron Swastika is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Saffron Swastika until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:55, 29 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ayodhya: The Case Against the Temple

edit
 

The article Ayodhya: The Case Against the Temple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOOK

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:02, 29 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ayodhya: The Case Against the Temple for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ayodhya: The Case Against the Temple is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayodhya: The Case Against the Temple until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:34, 2 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of The Story of Islamic Imperialism in India for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Story of Islamic Imperialism in India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Story of Islamic Imperialism in India until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Walrus Ji (talk) 09:44, 28 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of The Calcutta Quran Petition for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Calcutta Quran Petition is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Calcutta Quran Petition (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Walrus Ji (talk) 15:47, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Reply