Any frivolous messages will not be responded to. Please sign your posts.

Goldin Finance Edits

edit

Hello:

   Thank you for your note and careful read of my edits.  I am a new volunteer, so appreciate any guidance and feedback.  To be clear, the sentence I added was sourced to the same citation (Asia Today, maybe FEER...) as the sentence which preceded it.  I found the original text to inadequately explain why construction was stopped and that explanation was easily found in the cited source - so I added it.  I did not add a source citation (footnote) because the two sentences had the same source.  Should I have added an additional footnote citing the same source?  Best regards and thanks again,

Roberto

Roberto28281 (talk) 19:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:05, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply