BELPERDUVAL

Citation style

The citations you provided in The Strutt Family Trust(IT694/2002) are not quite sufficient. Citing a website such as http://pubarticles.com without more information to find the explicit page on that website doesn't help other user's verify your citations. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:04, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of THE STRUTT FAMILY TRUST

The article THE STRUTT FAMILY TRUST has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sign that this is a notable organization. None of the references discuss the trust in great detail, nor is having net assets exceeding $41 million so large as to be obviously notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bfigura ^(talk) 21:06, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Montreux69 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — CactusWriter | ^needles 21:00, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Strutt Family Trust, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Strutt Family Trust was changed by BELPERDUVAL (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-10-30T21:56:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:56, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with The Strutt Family Trust. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:56, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:58, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:59, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by MuZemike 02:14, 31 October 2009 (UTC))
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.