November 2007

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Logic of relatives. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as the text has been restored from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 07:42, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Logical matrix. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 07:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Relative term, you will be blocked from editing. Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 07:47, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Logic of relatives, you will be blocked from editing. Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 07:48, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Logic of relatives. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 07:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

"Blanking article by a banned user"?

edit

Since when is this a legitimate reason to blank an article? --Closedmouth 07:44, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I was wondering about that as well. Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 07:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case

edit
 

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/BABBUØ for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Closedmouth 06:33, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Reply