B.a.c.i.4.

File permission problem with File:Peace 1998.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Peace 1998.jpg and File:Abisso emozionale (Abime emotional)Massimo Taccon 1999.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Zil (talk) 14:22, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Critical Meditavism

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Critical Meditavism, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.pr.com/press-release/263353.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:20, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Critical Meditavism for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Critical Meditavism, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical Meditavism until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Melaen (talk) 11:38, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Requesting help from an admin

Hi, i see from your edit to the The Massimo Taccon talkpage here that you would like the assistance of an administrator. It’s quite unlikely that an admin will notice that message, because not many people have the page on their watchlist. The way for you to summon an admin is to place the Admin help template here on your own talk page. You’ll find the instructions at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Admin_help

Cheers, Ian Spackman (talk) 19:07, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Possible deletion of the article Massimo Taccon

Please see User talk:Tiger woman11. Thanks, Ian Spackman (talk) 05:07, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Work Number One: Conceptual Elaboration Cycle

Have to say Work Number One: Conceptual Elaboration Cycle is a really poor article right now. What exactly is " in order to witness the moral engagement that the Meditavists has taken towards the rest of humanity, as custodians of the "truth" in the art" all about? It comes across as absurb pompous nonsense. --Tagishsimon (talk) 19:46, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Work Number One: Conceptual Elaboration Cycle moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Work Number One: Conceptual Elaboration Cycle, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lapablo (talk) 10:11, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Work Number One: Conceptual Elaboration Cycle concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Work Number One: Conceptual Elaboration Cycle, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:54, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Massimo Taccon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Massimo Taccon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massimo Taccon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — MarkH₂₁^talk 08:47, 12 January 2020 (UTC)