Ayozek

Your submission at Articles for creation: One world escape project (October 7)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Nthep was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Appears to be an attempt to create a personal page for a project rather than an encyclopedia article about a notable topic. Please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Nthep (talk) 16:44, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Nthep (talk) 16:44, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:One world escape project

Hello, Ayozek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:One world escape project, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:04, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:One world escape project

Hello, Ayozek. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "One world escape project".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:15, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Flying wing. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 01:58, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Flying wing. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. BilCat (talk) 21:00, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Flying wing. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ahunt (talk) 21:20, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Flying wing, you may be blocked from editing. Ahunt (talk) 22:57, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Flying wing. Ahunt (talk) 22:59, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Please note that your recent talk page post was not very civil and included threats. Wikipedia requires that contributors be civil to make collaborating to build the encyclopedia possible. In future please be more polite in your talk page posts. Thank you. - Ahunt (talk) 23:10, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Notfrompedro (talk) 23:43, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Ahunt. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Notfrompedro (talk) 23:51, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy, as you did at User:Ayozek. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Longhair\^talk 23:58, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Longhair, I actually blocked indefinitely (a minute after you!). I'd like to see some assurances that the harassment will cease. Sorry, but 31 hours is a blip. El_C 00:02, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

@El C: That's fine. I am not fully aware of the history here but there seems to be a longstanding issue. I based my block on the recreation of their attack user-page. Happy with whatever you've chosen to do. -- Longhair\^talk 00:04, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Cool, appreciate that. Just ran into this by way of RfPP, but there is a history here that is concerning to me. Thanks again. El_C 00:06, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ayozek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

the flying wing page has been hijacked with its content diverted from aviation design to war technology or war history and they keep posting aviation technology that doesn't fit in the flying wing plane but blended wing body, i made notions in my page about user Ahunt and the despicable treatment commonly used by racial supremacist or warmongers in internet Ayozek (talk) 18:26, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Doubling down on the attacks you made on a user here in your unblock request will not result in your unblocking. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:48, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please refrain from hijacking pages as you did with one of the pages you edited. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ayozek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

besides hijacking, smears and obsolete content, wikipedia isn't exempt of users tribal, political, supremacist or racist behaviour and i have the right to point it out and ask for them to be blocked or another action when i was making a minor page editing and i was being reverted without any argument and them accused of vandalism, otherwise i will erase my account and ask to erase my contributions done by remaking few obsolete pages without any question nor discrepancy Ayozek (talk) 01:26, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 01:33, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

asking for ayozek account contributions deletion in those pages

Compressed-air vehicle

Compressed air car ‎

Centreless wheel ‎

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayozek (talk • contribs) 18:52, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

No. When you are blocked from editing you don't get round your block by getting someone else to make the edits you would like to make. JBW (talk) 16:03, 1 September 2021 (UTC)