Ayayron joans, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Ayayron joans! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aaron Jones (actor) (September 6) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 08:56, 6 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! edit

 
Hello, Ayayron joans. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 13:25, 6 September 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ayayron joans/sandbox edit

 

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Ayayron joans/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Melcous (talk) 03:31, 8 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please stop writing about yourself edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 03:31, 8 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Athaenara 03:47, 8 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ayayron joans (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I only posted and submitted this page once, I understood the terms after it was denied, there is no reason to ban me after one attempt. I didnt know not to self-promote previously

Decline reason:

No reply to 331dot in over a week. Procedural decline only - please feel free to open a new request when you are able to discuss. SQLQuery me! 15:40, 3 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Now that you know not to self-promote, what is it that you want to edit about? 331dot (talk) 18:12, 23 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Unblock Request edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Ayayron joans (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

my apologies for not returning your reply. I did not receive a notification in my email regarding your post. I would like to edit an article regarding the newest writing format: MLA8

Accept reason:

Based on your indication of a desire to contribute to areas unrelated to you and to your work. I strongly suggest you read through Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia and please be very mindful of conflict of interest guidance. It's a good idea to avoid any material related to you unless you are responding to problems in content somebody else has written, whereupon you would want to follow the processes described at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Help. Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:20, 28 October 2018 (UTC)Reply