March 2012 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Portal:Technology, you may be blocked from editing. John of Reading (talk) 20:32, 18 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 19 March 2012 edit

The Signpost: 26 March 2012 edit

The Signpost: 02 April 2012 edit

The Signpost: 09 April 2012 edit

The Signpost: 16 April 2012 edit

The Signpost: 23 April 2012 edit

The Signpost: 30 April 2012 edit

The Signpost: 07 May 2012 edit

Speedy deletion nomination of Sarvaang edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sarvaang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  IShadowed  ✰  22:04, 13 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 14 May 2012 edit

 
Hello, Aviyal. You have new messages at JohnCD's talk page.
Message added 20:26, 16 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Your signature edit

I found your signature confusing, and as you can see on my talk page, I had to tweak it to stop it muddling the layout of the page. See WP:Signatures for general advice, but in particular:

  • You must leave out the NOEDITSECTION "magic word". I don't know why you put it in, but its effect is to turn off all the section "Edit" links on the whole page, and nobody will be at all happy with that.
  • Although I don't think it is actually required, it is certainly desirable that your signature should show your username.
  • It's not desirable to have a ==== ==== heading inside your signature, which may confuse page layouts.
  • As laid out at present, the time appears on a new line with a leading space in front of it, which as you can see makes the layout go funny

General advice - tone it down and simplify it. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:26, 16 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 21 May 2012 edit

The Signpost: 28 May 2012 edit

The Signpost: 04 June 2012 edit

The Signpost: 11 June 2012 edit

The Signpost: 18 June 2012 edit

The Signpost: 25 June 2012 edit

The Signpost: 02 July 2012 edit

The Signpost: 09 July 2012 edit

The Signpost: 16 July 2012 edit

The Signpost: 23 July 2012 edit

The Signpost: 30 July 2012 edit

The Signpost: 06 August 2012 edit

The Signpost: 13 August 2012 edit

AFC Backlog edit

Articles for Creation urgently needs YOUR help!
 

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2491 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Are you autoconfirmed?
  5. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.

PS: we have a great AFC helper script at User:Timotheus Canens/afchelper4.js which helps in reviewing in just few edits easily!

We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 2 or 3 reviews, it would be extremely beneficial.
On behalf of the Articles for Creation project,
TheSpecialUser TSU

The Signpost: 20 August 2012 edit

The Signpost: 27 August 2012 edit

The Signpost: 03 September 2012 edit

Articles for Creation urgently needs your help! edit

 

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2491 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.

PS: we have a great AFC helper script at WP:AFCH!

News

Good article nominee AFCH script improvements
  • 1.16 to 1.17
    • Batman still works!

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation. If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.
Happy reviewing! TheSpecialUser TSU

Proposed deletion of File:Potatochopcs4logo.png edit

 

The file File:Potatochopcs4logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 15:07, 10 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

 Template:Nologo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 left a message at 07:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply