Australianfootballrules

Australianfootballrules, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Australianfootballrules! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there! Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:33, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Australianfootballrules, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Yeknom Dnalsli - TALK TO ME 09:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Australian rules football

I have no idea why you changed the phrase in many articles - it is obviously known as "Australian rules football", as the article name indicates. StAnselm (talk) 11:48, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

If you feel the usage of Australian rules football is not right, consensus is required. You are welcome to start this conversation at Talk:Australian rules football or WT:AFL. Hack (talk) 12:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

And please stop marking all your edits as minor. Help:Minor edit says: "A minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute." Your edits are very much disputed and have been reverted numerous times. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:23, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Australian rules football, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. StAnselm (talk) 01:45, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Notice

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Nuking candidate?. Thank you.  Ryan Vesey 02:24, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Australianfootballrules. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Jayron32 02:27, 14 September 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Australianfootballrules for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Hack (talk) 07:38, 14 September 2012 (UTC)