Austinrufener

May 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Star Trek (film). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Darrenhusted (talk) 13:08, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Unless this new concept you've come up with receives coverage in significant reliable sources, it isn't acceptable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Please see what Wikipedia is not (WP:OR and/or WP:SYNTH apply as well). –xeno ^talk 13:36, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

It may very well be sound, but Wikipedia is not a place to develop new concepts. Please review Wikipedia:No original research. –xeno ^talk 13:44, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Innate love

A tag has been placed on Innate love, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Darrenhusted (talk) 13:17, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

You are wrong. This is exactly what Wikipedia is here for.

Are you sure? Please review What Wikipedia is not. –xeno ^talk 13:54, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

[Copied from article talk page before deletion]:

This concept may be hard to understand if you do not have any training in developmental psychology. Please read up on Piaget's stages of development. Austinrufener (talk) 13:37, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

I see where you're going with this; that doesn't change the Wikipedia's stance on original or synthesized research. –xeno ^talk 13:47, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 13:44, 12 May 2009 (UTC)