Your submission at Articles for creation: The Iustus Republic (July 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 06:14, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Austin Jaax! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 06:14, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Iustus Republic Reply

edit

I don't have an issue with micronations per say, however given that the only sources provided are either self-created or a wiki-based source (which anybody can edit or add information - i.e. no real editorial oversight), with most of the information only added by yourself in the last few weeks. If you can provide some independent reliable secondary sources to show that this is not just something that you have made up then you may be able to show that the article and the subject are notable however at this stage you've provided nothing to show otherwise. Dan arndt (talk) 09:01, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sources such as MicroWiki are not considered as reliable sources as they are largely user-generated (see WP:UG). As I indicated above the information contained on the MicroWiki relating to the Iustus Republic, appears to be all generated by yourself - which is essentially a primary source or original research, either way it is not acceptable for Wikipedia. In addition there is the issue of whether you have a confict of interest. Dan arndt (talk) 09:33, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The Iustus Republic

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:The Iustus Republic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 05:03, 15 October 2018 (UTC)Reply