User talk:Atcovi/Archive 1

File permission problem with File:Sploder Game2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sploder Game2.jpg, which you've attributed to (screenshot). I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 02:27, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Sploder Game.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sploder Game.jpg, which you've attributed to (screenshot). I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:15, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

How come youre not in wikiquote anymore, hmm?

"I" would like to know, dude, we like met on there. REMEMBER ME? 2601:3:3A00:270:A401:AB53:6D74:2D30 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 02:35, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Hm... I really can't tell if you're a troll. But I'll asume good faith, I don't want to be on Wikiquote anymore. It's not my type of Wiki. And I kind of, you can try refreshening my mind. Please contact me on my Wikiversity pagee since I'm active there. Thanks. --Goldenburg111 (talk) 16:14, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

ok, made an acct. Now tell me ur xbox gamertag & ur age! DoggyFizzleTelevissle (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 18:49, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

T'is what I thought, you're that Wikiquote Vandal. Please stop harassing me. Thanks. --Atcovi (talk) 22:37, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Hey ther

Are you Goldenburg? DudeWithAFeud (talk) 19:43, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

User:DudeWithAFeud Yup! --Atcovi (talk) 11:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Response to email

Hi Atcovi, thanks for your email, I'm fine thank you. How are you? I prefer to talk on Wikipedia rather than using email unless what I'm talking about is particularly private. Thanks, LoudLizard (📞 | contribs | ✉) 11:03, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

LoudLizard: Then I doubt we will need email! Btw my question was left unanswered, would you mind explaining to me what the Science Olympics are? --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 13:58, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Atcovi, I don't think you asked me that question? I think you were talking to Prompri. Your message to him and subsequent email to me don't seem to be constructive. He has clearly stated on his talk page that he doesn't want to reveal his religion. You then said to me by email (presumably thinking I was Prompri) "Don't think of me as a stalker please, I'm only talking to you.. last time I check people don't have problems with other people talking to someone)". If this user doesn't want to talk to you, please respect this and leave them alone. Thanks, LoudLizard (📞 | contribs | ✉) 16:27, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

LoudLizard, please understand that I have no intention to come to him and talk to him if he does not want me to talk to him. Did he ever say “Leave me alone”? No… He simply said “respect my privacy rights”. In my view point, stating your religion isn’t privacy right violation. Now… I understand that he does not want his religion to be posted out loud. LoudLizard, I accidentally (have no idea how) got you and Prompri mixed up. Sent the wrong email as well. Understand that message was to clarify I’m not being a stalker, I was clarifying that I wanted to simply talk to him, since he seemed like an interesting person. If he told me to leave him alone, I’d do it… but as far as my knowledge goes, he never said that. Thank you. Also why did you restore my message? I undoed my message since I just realized that you were the wrong person. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 19:34, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Henry Caldera

Have added Sinhalese language template. Dan arndt (talk) 13:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Atcovi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Atcovi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikiversity links

Hi Atcovi,

I'm removing your links to the Plate Tectonics and Earth Structure page on Wikiversity, because I have some serious issues with the content. Particularly the idea of Fold mountains, as originally conceived as the explanation for the Alps, Pyrenees, Himalayas, Andes etc., is no longer accepted. The shortening in these mountain belts is dominated by thrust faulting, with folding secondary. I think that the Wikiversity page needs a lot of work before it becomes a useful resource that is worth linking to. Mikenorton (talk) 15:09, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Very well then, thanks for the explanation. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 16:06, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khan Academy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 5 January 2018 (UTC)