May 2007 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Full, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Gwernol 17:23, 29 May 2007 (UTC) heyReply

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Full. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gwernol 17:57, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Movie quote, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 17:57, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

December 2008 edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AtYourService100 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have done nothing wrong. There was a page and there had been an edit that was changed and I changed it back. That's all.

Decline reason:

Can you offer a source verifying that this is an accurate change? FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:11, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yeah. It said porn, someone changed it to pictures, and I changed it back. It didn't make sense to me. Why say he went on to look at pictures? Why not just say web surf?

No, I mean a source that the chimpanzee was looking at porn and not at pictures. You changed it, so I assume you double checked that it was accurate, right? Can you link to the source you found that confirmed that the chimp was looking at porn? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:24, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
This is odd; the edit before your did not change the word to 'pictures.' In fact, I went back to the very beginning of the article and couldn't find any version of it that used the word 'porn.' Can you link to the version of the article that said 'porn,' the version you thought was the correct one? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:29, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm trying to find it, but I'm having no luck. I'm positive it said it though. It was even sourced and everything. The said that the chimp attacked the lady because the porn perverted its mind or something along those lines.

Let me know when you find it; if it was there, it's still in the history. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:48, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply