Astrochologist

Welcome!

Hello, Astrochologist, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Astrochology, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Raziman T V (talk) 10:13, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Astrochology

The article Astrochology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Proposed for Deletion because (a) Wikipedia is not for newly coined words (see edit summary of creator) (b) Wikipeida does not include pages which are only definitions such as this one, and (b) the creator seems to have made these words up him/herself

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kingpin¹³ (talk) 10:15, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

The same goes for Astrochologist prefix:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives. Feel free to ask me if you need any help :). Best, - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 10:26, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi there. I'm not saying that neither is a legitimate science, and I'm not objecting to the word itself, as you seem to think I am. What I am objecting to is that this new word, coined by you, should have a Wikipedia page about it. Why do I think that the word should not have a Wikipedia page? Well, because Wikipedia is not for you to add things you made up (see WP:MADEUP), Wikipedia is not for new words (see WP:NEO), and Wikipedia does not include pages where the only content is a definition, because we are not a dictionary (see WP:NOTDICT). I hope that helps you understand why I've proposed the articles for deletion. Regards, - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 11:12, 30 October 2009 (UTC)