Welcome edit

Hello, Anamwrite, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 21:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammed Naseeruddin Corporator (March 19) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 21:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Anamwrite! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 21:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: A C Kadloor (March 22) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 04:11, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: YIMS (March 23) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 13:28, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Dr. A. B. Malaka Reddy moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Dr. A. B. Malaka Reddy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:38, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lumbini Park Yadgir edit

 
The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 21:32, 11 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nagangouda Kandkur edit

 
The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 21:36, 11 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Mohammed Naseeruddin moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Mohammed Naseeruddin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It does not show notability . Please do not move your drafts by uourself, but wair for a reviewer to confirm that its ready . I've returned your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 00:11, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

drafts edit

please do not move your own drafts to mainspace, but wait for a reviewer. I moved one back. Moving drafts yourself defeats the purpose of AfC/. Furthermore, it leaves loose ends that mess up our processes. . (the other two , Lumbini Park Yadgir and Nagangouda Kandkur seem OK, but marginal, and I did the necessary clean up for them. Do not be surprised if they are nominated for deletion by another editor. DGG ( talk ) 00:19, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of A c Kadlur for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A c Kadlur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A c Kadlur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Dixiku (talk) 00:09, 17 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

April 2021 edit

  Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with A.C. Kadlur. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 09:38, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Arif Kadloor edit

Hello, Asimrasoolwrite, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Umakant Bhalerao, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Arif Kadloor, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arif Kadloor.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Umakant Bhalerao}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 09:24, 4 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Question edit

Thanks for creating Vidyadhar Guruji Sayanna. Would you mind explaining where you found this image from?--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:50, 20 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Mohammed Naseeruddin has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mohammed Naseeruddin. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:29, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

July 2021 edit

  Hello, Asimrasoolwrite, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Asimrasool1998 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 10:31, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammed Naseeruddin (July 25) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:46, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 27 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Veer Basawanthreddy Mudnal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doctor. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of A.C.Kadloor for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A.C.Kadloor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.C.Kadloor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DMySon (talk) 11:21, 8 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of A C Kadloor edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on A C Kadloor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A C Kadloor. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mccapra (talk) 21:07, 15 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:YIMS edit

  Hello, Asimrasoolwrite. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:YIMS, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 23 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Vishwanath Reddy Mudnal edit

  Hello, Asimrasoolwrite. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vishwanath Reddy Mudnal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 23 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammed Naseeruddin (September 6) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nitesh003 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nitesh003(TALK) 01:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Vishwanath Reddy Mudnal edit

 

Hello, Asimrasoolwrite. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vishwanath Reddy Mudnal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Ji11720 (talk) 19:18, 23 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

stub sorting edit

Don't do this, it is already fully stub sorted. [1] Curbon7 (talk) 09:14, 3 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

[2] Again please refrain. Curbon7 (talk) 23:16, 3 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia and copyright edit

  Hello Asimrasoolwrite! Your additions to Kadechur have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 22:20, 8 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Categories on your user page edit

Hi Asimrasoolwrite! I see that you have reverted my bot's edits to your user page. Per WP:USERNOCAT, user pages are not articles, and thus do not belong in content categories such as Category:History of India. They can however be placed in user categories – subcategories of Category:Wikipedians, such as Category:Wikipedians interested in Indian history – which assist collaboration between users. I'm also concerned about your use of Category:Articles about multiple people, as usernames may not be shared amongst multiple people. I have deleted the article categories from your user page. Hope this helps you understand, and happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 17:38, 14 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

January 2022 edit

  Your edit to Vidyadhar Guruji Sayanna has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 18:52, 7 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Asimrasool1998 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Asimrasool1998. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit (blether) 11:40, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Asimrasoolwrite (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi sir, I humbly request you to please don't block my account, this is the only account which I use to make my edits. My previous account Asimrasool1998 was blocked that's why I created this account. I don't use any other account. Sir, I request you to please don't block my account. Thank You! Asimrasoolwrite (talk) 13:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Blocks apply to the person, not just the account. Until your original account is unblocked, you are not permitted to edit here. See WP:BLOCK, WP:EVADE, and WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 13:27, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tourism in Yadgir district edit

 Template:Tourism in Yadgir district has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply