Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 11) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Ashok Dhoble! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Star Mississippi were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Star Mississippi 15:50, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ashok Dhoble/sandbox edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Ashok Dhoble/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Star Mississippi 15:51, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Dear Star Mississippi,
I acknowledge the speedy deletion tag placed on my sandbox page, User:Ashok Dhoble/sandbox, citing section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. I understand the concern regarding potential unambiguous advertising.
However, I would like to clarify that the content in my sandbox is a work in progress and not intended for promotional purposes. I am in the process of developing the content to ensure it aligns with Wikipedia's guidelines and is presented in an encyclopedic manner.
I kindly request the opportunity to continue working on the page, revising and improving the content to adhere to Wikipedia's standards. I am committed to ensuring the page is informative, neutral, and valuable to the Wikipedia community.
Thank you for considering my request.
Sincerely, Ashok Dhoble Ashok Dhoble (talk) 10:00, 15 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
In addition to being promotional, that was a copyright violation so we cannot restore it. You're welcome to start again using advice here and ask for help at the Teahouse. Happy too to help if I can. Star Mississippi 13:06, 15 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Please see my deletion notice for the draft.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:37, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Education, Research and Incubation Centre, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikishovel (talk) 09:27, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Education, Research and Incubation Centre (October 18) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Dan arndt (talk) 09:27, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

October 2023 edit


Hello, Ashok Dhoble. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. The page Draft:Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Education, Research and Incubation Centre has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not an outlet for promotion, advocacy, or advertising.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see this page on citing sources and Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{Reflist}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.You can ask for help at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk and on IRC chat Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:35, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


The websites of subjects are not only not independent of the subject, they are also generally too promotional. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:35, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Star Mississippi 12:22, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
In addition to the copyright violations for which you've been warned multiple times, you're clearly here to promote Abdul Kalam and the research center. If you're going to be unblocked you'll need to disclose your WP:COI and tell us what else you're going to edit about. Star Mississippi 12:25, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply