Ashhab1323

Welcome!

Hello, Ashhab1323, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Masssly —M@sssly✉ 15:32, 10 June 2015 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

—M@sssly^✉ 15:32, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

Davin1344 (talk) 09:13, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Didierforever may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Speedy deletion does not belong on user pages Paul  Bradbury 21:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

My user page

Hi. Please DO NOT edit my user page. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 19:08, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Problematic editing of 2015 SAFF Championship

Hi Ashhab1323, in these 1 & 2 edits on the article 2015 SAFF Championship you claim to be removing unsourced material, when in reality it is quite clear the Pakistan is not taking part in the event. I added two extra sources for good measure. If you feel that the article has issues please consider discussing it on the article's talk page. Thanks. Inter&anthro (talk) 19:53, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

January 2016

I am assuming that your edit to Template:ICC T20I Championship rankings is a good faith edit, but the reference given still supports the previous figures. If you want to include new figures, you need a new ref. --David Biddulph (talk) 18:39, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Non-free image usage

Hi Ashhab1323. File:Bangladesh Cricket Board Logo.svg is a non-free image which means that each usage of it on Wikipedia must satisfy all 10 of the non-free content criteria listed in WP:NFCCP as well as not be any of the uses listed in WP:NFC#Unacceptable use. The file's usage in Bangladesh national cricket team currently does not satisfy WP:NFCC#10c. If you want to use the image in a particular way, you need to provide a valid non-free use rationale that is specific to said usage per WP:NFCCE. Personally, I don't feel such a rationale can be provided because using the image in the national team's article is problematic per number 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. You can discuss this if you like at WP:FFD or WP:MCQ, but continuing to re-add the image without resolving the non-free content issues is not really the way to go and could easily be seen as edit warring or a copyright violation. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:32, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

I did not notice that you added a non-free use rationale when I removed the file. My mistake and I have self-reverted and re-added it to the article. However, I do not think a valid non-free use rationale can be written for that particular usage because the non-free logos for parent entities (like national governing bodies, etc.) are generally not considered OK to use in articles for child entities (such as individual teams, etc.) per number 17 of WP:NFC#UUI, so I have started a discussion about this file's use at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 February 18#File:Bangladesh Cricket Board Logo.svg and asked for the opinions of other editors. Please feel free to comment if you like, but try and remember that the fact that other stuff exists is not always a good argument to try and make in such discussions and that WP:NFCC is not only a policy, but it was something created directly by the Wikimedia Foundation through a resolution. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi Ashhab1323. Just saw that you re-added File:Bangladesh Cricket Board Logo.svg to Bangladesh national cricket team and after it was removed from the article by administrator Explicit. You also re-added the non-free use rationale for the article to File:Bangladesh Cricket Board Logo.svg after it was also removed by Explicit. For reference, the file's non-free usage was discussed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 February 18#File:Bangladesh Cricket Board Logo.svg and the result was "remove from Bangladesh national cricket team". Generally when you disagree with the close of an administrator, it's considered a good idea to discuss your concerns with them on their user talk page instead of simply reverting them per WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. Administrators have some discretion in their closes so its possible that you will be able to change their mind, but you should at least attempt to discuss it with them. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:47, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi again Ashhab1323. As I mentioned above, this file's non-free usage was discussed at WP:FFD. If you feel the file should be allowed to be used in Bangladesh national cricket team, then please discuss your reasons with Explicit at User talk:Explicit since he is the administrator who closed the FFD discussion and he was the one who removed the file from the article and the corresponding non-free use rationale from the file's page. Non-free content usage must comply with WP:NFCC due to copyright concerns so continuing to add the file to the article without discussing it with Explict means there is a chance he will see doing so as disruptive and failing to get the point. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:25, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi again Ashhab1323. I've posted about this at User talk:Explicit#File:Bangladesh Cricket Board Logo.svg . Explicit is the administrator who closed the Files for Discussion thread about the non-free use of the file. If you have questions about the close, then you should discuss it with him. The files non-free usage was determined to not comply with Wikipedia's non-free content policy. Continuing to re-add the file may be seen as edit warring or disruptive and possibly result in an administrator taking action. The file is being removed per WP:NOT3RR as a possible copyright violation. If you feel the file should be allowed to be used in the article, then please discuss why with Explicit. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:42, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Ashhab1323, please note that you do not have consensus to restore this logo to any other article. As Marchjuly pointed out above, a discussion took place and the decision was to remove the logo from Bangladesh national cricket team because it violated our extremely rigid WP:NFCC policy. If you believe the logo satisfies all the points of the criteria, please present your argument at WP:FFD for others to opine, in order to create a different consensus. Please note that edit summaries like this can be perceived as having a ownership issue, a behavioral pattern that is also highly discouraged. — ξ^xplicit 00:59, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

At it again. Please read and respond to the above. Spike 'em (talk) 21:03, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Ashhab1323, your continued disregard for consensus and policy has become disruptive. If you re-add the image again without consensus to do so, you will be blocked. — ξ^xplicit 23:55, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

September 6, 2016

Hello, I'm Drdpw. I wanted to let you know that I undid your recent contribution to List of amendments to the United States Constitution because you didn't provide a reference to back up the new numbers you provided. If/when you can cite a source, please feel free to add new and updated numbers. Cheers. Drdpw (talk) 21:10, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ashhab1323. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ashhab1323. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Minhazuddin Ahmed Sagar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Minhazuddin Ahmed Sagar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minhazuddin Ahmed Sagar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 18:56, 24 June 2023 (UTC)