Speedy deletion nomination of User:Asheshshah edit

 

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Asheshshah, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. VVikingTalkEdits 13:54, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply


{{unblock-spamun|Ashesh Shah|want to add more info on wikipedia}

Contested deletion edit

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (I object to the deletion on my page. Show me one page where company or person has not used wikipedia to their advantage) --corporate, industrial and panoramic photographer 14:14, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

November 2016 edit

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Jagriti Yatra. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 15:56, 22 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Asheshshah/sandbox edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Asheshshah/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Alexf(talk) 16:01, 22 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

November 2016 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. Vanamonde (talk) 05:34, 26 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Vanamonde (talk) 06:29, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

I warned you about promotional editing, yet you chose to continue to try and add a promotional profile of yourself on this site. You are still able to edit this talk page, because I hold out a faint hope that you will choose to make constructive contributions; but if you post the profile here again, I will remove your ability to edit this page, too. Vanamonde (talk) 06:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Asheshshah (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #17153 was submitted on Dec 18, 2016 12:07:40. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 12:07, 18 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

please unblock me edit

Dear editors / admistrators please understand I was new and would not understand the complexity of wikipedia. Please unblock me. I would just like to put two lines in userpage.I have already uploaded few photos in wikimedia commons.

asheshashesh 08:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Asheshshah (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #17301 was submitted on Jan 09, 2017 14:56:50. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 14:56, 9 January 2017 (UTC)Reply