Welcome

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Asgrrr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  IZAK 15:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Iran-Iraq War. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. "If you have broken 3RR by mistake and now realize it, or if another user has left you a note on your talk page that points out that you broke 3RR, then you should revert your change back to the "other version", even though you may not like the previous version. In general, this should be enough to prevent you from being blocked, although there are no guarantees."- Wikipedia policy.

um... sorry for any incivility

edit

No offence taken I hope. You may have noticed the I/IW article sees quite a bit of intermittent vandalism with quite weighty- and on further investigation- quite untrue claims, which tends to lower my bar for suspiciousness especially when I haven't had a good day. Anyway... appreciated your editing on the Humpback Whale article. I've tried running the reference you added, (http://www.visir.is/article/20071119/FRETTIR01/111190114), through a few online translators, for Icelandic, Swedish, Dutch, had no luck. I think I get the gist of it, but if you could point to or make a rough translation, that would be helpful, especially for searching up published articles on the research. Unfortunately, the capture of the IWC by reflexive anti-whalers has lead to a problematic attitude towards new research showing natural increases in population numbers (e.g. the highly dated humpback whale population numbers here, for example). John Nevard (talk) 09:36, 22 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

The least reactive element

edit
 
Hello, Asgrrr. You have new messages at Talk:Helium#Second least reactive element%3F.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Double sharp (talk) 14:40, 1 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Clown world

edit

Hello, Asgrrr,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Missionedit and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Clown world, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Missionedit}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 01:08, 21 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Clown world featuring pepe the frog.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Clown world featuring pepe the frog.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Clown world for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clown world is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clown world until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –MJLTalk 01:01, 3 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tōgō Heihachirō, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Lee. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cultural depictions of Richard Nixon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Palmer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply