User talk:AryaTargaryen/Archive 2016
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Max Tomos in topic re:Regarding the Potco article
Concerning the Pirates of the Caribbean Online Page edit
These individuals are continuing to overturn the edit you made which adheres to Wikipedia's neutrality clause. To clarify, the only reason I am continuing to edit it is solely to revert their vandalisms/revert the page to the state it was in when last you edited it.
Regards, Pearson Wright — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pearson Wright (talk • contribs) 01:53, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
re:Regarding the Potco article edit
If you haven't noticed, Pearson Wright is the one who's edit warring, not me. Good day.--Max Tomos (talk) 08:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Since you are also involved in this dispute, please join this discussion.--Max Tomos (talk) 15:05, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- TLOPO was the first. That's the fact, whether you like it or not. Saying that it's "irrelevant" would be like saying it's irrelevant who was the first man on the Moon or who was the first to discover America.--Max Tomos (talk) 08:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- A breach of neutrality would be removing one project and leaving the other, like Pearson Wright did on more than one occasion. That's not what I'm doing. I'm simply presenting the facts. If the POR team was the first to start recreating POTCO I would insist that POR is mentioned first. But it wasn't.--Max Tomos (talk) 08:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- TLOPO was the first. That's the fact, whether you like it or not. Saying that it's "irrelevant" would be like saying it's irrelevant who was the first man on the Moon or who was the first to discover America.--Max Tomos (talk) 08:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)