September 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Blaze Wolf. I noticed that in this edit to Battle of Keeratsagar, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:40, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your helpful comments, I left a message on the article's Talk Page explaining the reason for my deletion. Again, my apologies for not documenting this earlier.
~~~ NorthWu (talk) 15:54, 10 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Basantpur (September 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 04:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Arty.mishra! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notice of noticeboard discussion

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ∆ P&t ♀√ (talk) 19:59, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Akshay Singh Rajput Thakur per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Akshay Singh Rajput Thakur. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
-- RoySmith (talk) 21:09, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arty.mishra (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The person who copied and pasted someone's question is not called his shockpuppet. That source was correct so i copied and pasted it. Arty.mishra (talk) 02:15, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Maybe we should start calling people "shockpuppets". It sounds more fun than a sockpuppet.   Confirmed shockpuppet. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:01, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.