ArturSik
| This is ArturSik's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3 |
TFA edit
Thank you today for Margaret (singer), "about one of the most popular contemporary artists in Poland with some achievements in other European countries and after her participation in Melodifestivalen 2018 she will undoubtedly attract even more attention"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Joe Alywn Grammy Nom/Win edit
Howdy, This article describes how he would receive a grammy if "Exile" were to win, so he did technically receive a nomination. From my understanding of Grammy/album credit rules (I could be wrong) since Alywn contributed lyrics and piano arrangement for the album, he would technically be credited. Thank you.
Mare Micksen (talk) 15:54, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Mare Micksen: Hi. Unfortunately, this article is inaccurate. First of all, Best Performance categories recognise performers not songwriters. As for the album award, I believe they only recognise main contributors. I simply go by what the official Grammys website says and when you look up either William Bowery or Joe Alwyn they're not there. ArturSik (talk) 10:45, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Sounds good, thank you for the info!
Mare Micksen (talk) 00:44, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Weronika Rosati edit
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Weronika Rosati you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Weronika Rosati edit
The article Weronika Rosati you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Weronika Rosati for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:41, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Weronika Rosati edit
The article Weronika Rosati you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Weronika Rosati for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:02, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Harry Styles edit
On 2 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Harry Styles, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Harry Styles (pictured), who is known for his flamboyant fashion, was voted the Most Stylish Man of the Year by GQ in 2020? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Harry Styles. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Harry Styles), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Would you by any chance be able to leave comments on this PR? SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 14:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Lady Gaga Genealogy edit
Hi I don’t know if you’re aware but I gave sources for the reason I changed Gaga‘s ancestry. I am guessing you either didn’t read my description or are being snobby in that you want me to add the sources to the bottom of the page in citations… but I’m not very good at doing that yet… so rather than delete my work I would appreciate you actually helping me here and reading what I wrote in both the talk page and my edit reasoning in regards to her genealogy. Thank you! Magnumb22 (talk) 06:00, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
I also want to mention that if you look at the source that is being used in regards to her ancestry in the original (factually-incorrect) edit you brought back it is an opinion piece from the Washington Post… not a valid source especially in regards to someone’s genealogy.
Magnumb22 (talk) 06:03, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Magnumb22: Hi. I'm not sure which sources you are referring to because you provided none in the article, which is a must when adding any new content on Wikipedia. The one source you included on the talk page is not a reliable source. You can learn more about what is considered a reliable source here. Good luck with future edits. ArturSik (talk) 20:59, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Are you trying to start an edit war? Forget about the sources and look at the information that I put in the talk page… Do your own research maybe and then get back to me on it and answer me this… do you know what Genealogy means and is. Have you ever tried to research genealogy because it sounds to me like you may not understand the basics of researching people’s genealogy and/or ancestry. Magnumb22 (talk) 23:14, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Harry Styles Personal Life edit
Hello ArturSik!
I have been working on Harry's personal life section for a few months now in attempts to make the way it discusses his sexual orientation more respectful and I have noticed you watch over that page a lot. Thank you so much for blessing my edits to it the other day - it really meant a lot. I have one last request, which is that I think that Harry's personal life section much like Tyler the Creator's should cite one of his songs, as Harry says he prefers to relay a lot of his life experiences through his music rather than interviews. After thinking through how to phrase it, I added the sentence about his song Medicine to his personal life section. Do you feel like it seems to be phrased respectfully in a way that points out that critics have interpreted it a certain way? If so, as an experienced editor, would you please watch over it? I defer to your judgement as I know you have a history with the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by H-influenzae (talk • contribs) 21:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Harry's band edit
Hello! Sorry but I really think erasing Harry's band is simply not ok unless you also intend to erase every member of One Direction. He has literally toured with Mitch Rowland and Sarah Jones longer than he toured with any of the members of One Direction. They are mentioned in every tour review, including in the big publications like NME and Rolling Stone. It's akin to ignoring Bowie's work with Tin Machine and saying all of it needs its own article. H-influenzae (talk) 01:57, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Ah sorry, nevermind, I misread what you deleted! Looks good actually I agree it was getting bogged down. H-influenzae (talk) 02:05, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Harry Styles edit
Given the song Medicine has its own page that details its reception and the same goes for the dress, could you remove that section and restore it to the neutral tone it had before https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Styles&oldid=1093711874#Philanthropy_and_advocacy 92.80.146.183 (talk) 05:36, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Joanna Kulig edit
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Joanna Kulig you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FrB.TG -- FrB.TG (talk) 22:21, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Joanna Kulig edit
The article Joanna Kulig you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Joanna Kulig and Talk:Joanna Kulig/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FrB.TG -- FrB.TG (talk) 12:02, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Joanna Kulig edit
The article Joanna Kulig you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Joanna Kulig for comments about the article, and Talk:Joanna Kulig/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FrB.TG -- FrB.TG (talk) 10:22, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Precious anniversary edit
 | |
| Six years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:39, 29 March 2024 (UTC)