Arthur Holland

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Graham ☺ | Talk 16:18, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

==Wobblybob123== I did not edit or vandalise the Lincoln Cathedral wiki. I can only assume that a dynamic ip has been re-allocated and somehow attributed to myself. Wobblybob123 (talk) 22:44, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Mike South

Why did you revert my edit? I posted a link with more than enough proof including a validated blood test. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.85.134.67 (talk) 14:26, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Salad cream

It's your lucky day--I've made a salad cream page. Noticed you're linked to the substance (which I've never seen; I'm an American) but I just thought it needed an article. BTW I'm a vegan and I'd never eat it in any case. Regards, Badagnani 11:03, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

Message

Sorry, I got a bit carried away with the photos. Sebstuart 27th Jan 2006

Colonel Blimp picture

I thought that might not work. Any idea how it could be done so that we avoid the thin column of text between the still from the film and the big box on the right? SteveCrook 04:18, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Arthur, is your name really Adolph

I'm sorry, but are you really implicating that you were named Adolf, I'm guessing that was it due to your Austrian heritage and why don't you legally change your name to something else.Having a name like Adolph could lose you oppurtunities in jobs, I know I have an odd name too

Advert

If you would like to join the Napoleonic Fiction Wikiproject then please click on the link. We are working to make articles on Sharpe/Hornblower or anything else you can think of to be better presented on Wikpedia.

If you are not sure then you can leave a message at my talk page. Thanks Ethers ^[talk]

Remember me Arthur

Long time, no talk, I wonder wat evil soul vandalised your page. I understand you wanted to revert my changes to the William DeVino article? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.107.214.71 (talk) 16:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC).

Non-free use disputed for Image:Laurie-the gun seller-1-.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Laurie-the gun seller-1-.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:47, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Sydney Push

Classic quote on the George-back-room denizens! It also shows clearly how and why Clive was never a 'member' of the Push, though some of his literary associates were. Cheers Bjenks (talk) 01:40, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Arthur Holland, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Arthur Holland/Lofty large. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Lofty Large

Hello! Your submission of Lofty Large at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:47, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Lofty Large

Sorry, I didn't realize it was British spelling. I'll revert my change. Yoninah (talk) 08:30, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lofty Large

Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Lofty Large Aden 1966.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lofty Large Aden 1966.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 22:39, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wire

Hey, great edits on Wire articles! I just read this book which you may be interested in [1]. It was pretty good.. there is a decent amount of analysis that could be incorporated in articles here--I'm not sure when/if I'll have the time to do it though. Thanks --CutOffTies (talk) 15:36, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi CutOffTies, Thanks for the thumbs up - nice to know work done is appreciated. I might well check out the book you recommend, although at the moment I'm working my way through the official series guide, as there's some good stuff in that too, which could help improve some of the articles.

By a rather circular coincidence, I've just watched Spirit of the Marathon (and very good it was too) after stumbling on the Wikipedia page you wrote on the subject. So good work there. Ah, mutual appreciation, eh. Ain't it grand?

Also, for future reference, as you may have seen on my user page, I've set up a second account, user:Gus Haynes, purely for Wire edits so that I don't clog up my regular watchlist. Arthur Holland (talk) 13:55, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

I really appreciate you sharing that about the documentary article! --CutOffTies (talk) 03:29, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

File:PC103099.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PC103099.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 20:30, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

New footnote

Arthur, you should improve the wording in the new footnote you added. It reads: "in 1890 the total population of Rio de Janeiro was 515,559. Of these only 55,861 (10.8% of the total population) were not eligible to vote solely because of their illiteracy". Anyone who reads it will believe that the remaining 460,000 inhabitants of Rio de Janeiro could vote. Also, since you're adding that data, you should also add the correct page numbers where they are found in the book: pages 84 and 85. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 17:03, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Empire of Brazil FAC nomination

Are you enjoying your first FAC nomination? Trust me, is always like that. They treat us like garbage and we have to smile at them. Nice, huh? Ow, and leave Fifelfoo's comments on sources and references to Astynax, he'll deal with it. --Lecen (talk) 02:06, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Louise Camuto

Hi Arthur, Thanks for your help on this subject. What would suffice as a good source for this information then? Is it better just to remove her educational history? --65.51.232.210 (talk) 17:26, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Well, a valid source would be a mainstream newspaper article, magazine article, or mainstream TV/radio program. However, given that the article's subject is (I presume) not sufficiently notable to have received any mainstream media attention since her beauty pageant days, I presume this won't be possible? As it stands, if you leave the educational info as it is, it will remain in the article but with the tags in place. You can come back later and put acceptable references in if you are able to find any.

I know it all seems a bit draconian, but it's the only way to a) stop people putting self-aggrandizing statements into articles about themselves, and b) stop people from putting libelous statements into articles about people they dislike.

Any further queries, just shout. Arthur Holland (talk) 17:44, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Requesting your opinion

Arthur Holland, since you are one of the nominators of Empire of Brazil to Featured status, I'd like to request your opinion at Talk:John VI of Portugal#Requested move. I'm having a huge headache with an user called Cripipper in Talk:Empire of Brazil#Anglicization of names. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 15:44, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Afonso, Prince Imperial of Brazil

Arthur, in case you're interested in joining the team again, the next article I will nominate to Featured status will be Afonso, Prince Imperial of Brazil. A third opinion in it is always good. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 16:06, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

The Contribution Team cordially invites you to Imperial College London

All Hail The Muffin Nor does it taste nice... 15:03, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Coast Salish people

This person who keeps adding edits to this article is annoying me.If they continue to do it(and I think they will) do you want to report them or should I?--Nyswimmer (talk) 15:46, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm doing it now. Cheers for heads up though. Arthur Holland (talk) 15:46, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks:)--Nyswimmer (talk) 15:48, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism

I have recieved messaeges saying I have vandalised some pages. I have never even heard of these pages let alone edited them. This maybe somebody hacking my IP address. These messages date from 2010 when I did not know how to edit Wikipedia.--62.7.92.50 (talk) 12:51, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Not sure what to say really. Your IP address is registered to St Edmunds School in Hertfordshire. Are you saying you're not accessing the internet from this school? If not, and you don't know anything about the edits, then I would suggest you ignore any messages that pop up. Arthur Holland (talk) 13:30, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Arthur, wow, I appreciate your help

Thanks Arthur, wow, I appreciate your help. I think I did pretty good creating that page. It was my first time and it took about 6 hours! As far as the text, I kept hearing my dad (a policeman) say "just the facts ma'am." But most of the time was spent gathering and formatting the references. I created some pages for IMDb a few years ago so I kinda/sorta knew what to do. I posted your revisions and improvements, Thanks again, HollyDHS5646Calif (talk) 17:34, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Win Butler

Please can you do some research on Win Butler, and stop making such threats on my talk page? I find it rather troubling that you would flex your muscles in such a manner, just leave me to edit please. 87.114.244.70 (talk) 12:17, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Win Butler Source

He's known to have a strong interest in soccer, and Bradford City FC are a fourth tier team who get 10,000 fans in a 25,000 seater, Win Butler has been identified as a potential crowd-puller by the owners.. I can't say what he's privately said to the chairmen of Bradford City but read between the lines. The Football (or Soccer) industry is rather secretive when the manager selection period takes place, so good luck finding a source. I guess you'll just have to delete... 87.114.244.70 (talk) 12:24, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

for the info. Palosirkka (talk) 13:31, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Arthur, Hey it's Holly... I could sure use your help again. Re: paul whitehead (politician) ...we've written the page, and it's posted! at least we think so... but now we want to get the link for Paul Whitehead (politician) --not Paul WHitehead-- into 2 pages: California's 36th congressional district and California's 36th congressional district special election, 2011 but i think it's about disambiguation because there is that other Paul Whitehead ...Please help, Thanks:) hollyDHS5646Calif (talk) 02:58, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

True Grit

Hi! Let's review the edit here

Your edit summary was: "RV good faith edit. She wasn't Steinfeld's double - she played the adult, amputee Mattie. She had more screen time than Elizabeth Marvel, who voiced (and played in close-up) the adult Mattie"

Well, the article describes the woman as being "the character's body double" - But then all that means is that your edit should have corrected/clarified the text. I don't see why the entire paragraph was removed. WhisperToMe (talk) 20:48, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

I think because the particular double actress was interviewed in depth in a major U.S. newspaper about her role, the statement is more important than if it was merely a piece of trivia from a DVD cover. I'll see if I can find more sources about Ruth Morris... WhisperToMe (talk) 21:13, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

I found one other source from a different Texas newspaper: Ward, Alyson. "Chance led Ruth Morris to 'True Grit,' but her role isn't a new one." Fort Worth Star-Telegram. Tuesday December 21, 2010. -- I'll rewrite an expand the paragraph using this source too. WhisperToMe (talk) 21:14, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I posted the new paragraph. Hopefully it illustrates the significance better WhisperToMe (talk) 21:19, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Alrighty :) WhisperToMe (talk) 14:58, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Luis Fortuño 'and' removal

Hello I've just noticed you correctly reversed a nameless contributor's addition of 'and'. I also thought it was a good faith edit on his part, but I am now noticing that he is systematically creating small faulty edits on several articles, and never discusses anything. He seems particularly obsessed with removing ALL instances of 'due to' in favour of 'because of' even when not appropriate. I'd write to him and but he has no talk page. From his multiple contributions this month only, I'd say nearly half of them deserve reversal, but my grammar isn't impeccable either. Would you have a look at his contributions and see if you agree? Cheers--Tallard (talk) 04:01, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

For for

Sorry, Arthur, sometimes let myself get carried away in the spelling corrections. I thought "for for" was in most cases a repetition. I apologize for the mistakes, i'll be more careful. Good job,--Eumolpo (talk) 06:43, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Wyncandy writes...

...No worries - thanks for the tips! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyncandy (talk • contribs) 20:44, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Sticking my nose in

I don't know why I'm butting in, since NYB will no doubt answer your question the next time he logs on, but it looked as if his revert of your edits might have caused you some distress, so I'll say something: I would wager a large sum of money that he hit the rollback button on his watchlist by mistake. I know I've done that a couple of times myself. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:51, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi Floquenbeam -- thanks for the message. I thought it might be that myself, as it was (I thought) a pretty inoffensive/constructive sequence of edits.

Anyway, I appreciate your concern for my wounded wiki-pride. Cheers. ;-) Arthur Holland (talk) 22:56, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

well, 33% concern for your wounded wiki-pride, 67% avoiding large quantity of work in the real world, but you're welcome anyway. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:00, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Now that's a scenario I am familiar with.... Arthur Holland (talk) 23:02, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Mr Creosote

(Copied from my talkpage) I have no memory of that edit and certainly did not intend it. The article is on my watchlist, and I must have hit the "rollback" button inadvertently. I apologize, and have restored your edits. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 01:01, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Apology

Hello, my name is Tyler(STCooper1). I am sorry about the True Grit edit. I did that before Doniago talked to me about excessive editing. I have edited True Grit again and left out a lot of excess material. I hope it is better now. I will not do any more excess editing. (STCooper1 (talk) 17:30, 23 April 2011 (UTC)) )

Barnstar

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		Wasn't sure where to put this but considering your excellent minor edits and great cleanup work, here's a barnstar :) Andy4789 (talk) 18:02, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

OK

Thank you. I will. Appreciate your kindness. (STCooper1 (talk) 01:55, 24 April 2011 (UTC))

verification

Hello, my name is Tyler. I just did an edit to the biography of Edward Teach(Blachbeard) and would like to ask you a question. I just changed the way Teach died to something I both read in a book and saw on a history channel presentation about him. I read that changes must be verifiable. Does that count as verifying that he died that way? Thank you STCooper1 (talk) 19:55, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Stephen Fry

Hi Arthur, Thanks for adding P. G. Wodehouse and Evelyn Waugh to the list of influences to Stephen Fry. I knew when I added Oscar Wilde that I had been incomplete, but I didn't have his biography at hand. :)

I'd like to direct your attention to the Stephen Fry talk page on the discussion I tried to start about adding his honorary degrees to the infobox. I'm from Holland :P and this needs some British eyes. Thanks --IIVeaa (talk) 11:32, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of William Devino for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Devino is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Devino until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

All English churches that pre-date the reformation are catholic in origin

I have added a new section to Lincoln Cathedral's talk page where we can discuss the statement of a very general nature, which Woodseats44 (talk) has repeatedly added to the summary statement at the top of Lincoln Cathedral: "Like all medieval buildings that are now cathedrals of England, Lincoln Cathedral is Roman Catholic in origin as it predates the Reformation." before making any further changes. — GrahamSmith (talk) 13:38, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

I hadn't read the whole discussion. This person is doing the rounds of the cathedrals. I'll check what s/he has been up to, but probably not for 12 hours as I am off to the Sydney Royal Easter Show. It always seems so strange to have the major Harvest Festival at Easter. All through Lent, the country towns are holding local shows. And because everything is so totally upside-down, there will be baby lambs and spring flowers, as well as autumn flowers. Amandajm (talk) 22:30, 12 April 2012 (UTC).

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. When you recently edited Nell McAndrew, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Teresa Cristina of the Two Sicilies

Thank you very much for your help on improving Teresa Cristina of the Two Sicilies. I really appreciate that, Arthur. --Lecen (talk) 11:26, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi Lecen – you're very welcome. Always a pleasure. Arthur Holland (talk) 11:35, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Here's a thought

A "pointless change of punctuation" is almost an oxymoron. Ankh.Morpork 23:56, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Breakfast

Hello, Arthur Holland. You are invited to join WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of breakfast-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:59, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Bulletproof vest

You've made a mistake, his name's Kazimierz Żegleń. Look it up and correct ok? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.252.10.2 (talk) 20:38, 22 May 2013 (UTC) Ok then, I apologise. I even don't know how i did make those changes you've mentioned. I wanted just to change one's name to his own because i find it more appropriate.

Shane Battier

Yes, you have made a mistake with the editing. 142.197.21.18 (talk) 20:53, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Paris-Sorbonne article

Dear Arthur,

My name is Joshua and I'm a Master student in History of Art at Paris-Sorbonne University. In order to reply to your message, I would like to say that I consistently change the modifications I guess you have been making in the past few months about the article because I would like to provided with updated ranking information about the university. The QS 2014 ranking results have been published few weeks ago and the university ranks first in France, whereas it was ranked second last year, as you recorded.

On the other hand, I do think that the overall ranking performance you provided with is OK, but is not to be considered "paramount", at least, not to be put first in a introduction paragraph of an article on a university specialized in Arts and Humanities. I hope you understand my point.

Let me know what you think. Don't want you to think that I'm trying to mess things up or that I want to disagree with you on purpose.

Best. J. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.137.124.56 (talk) 18:10, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Sorry!

To whom it may concern,

I'm very sorry that my minor edit's to "Walter Tull" have disappointed you, feel free to up level my writing. I was only trying to help and do my best. Please keep in mind that I'm a young adult and I am new to Wikipedia. Thank you for your co-operation. XOXO

:3 cupcake1075 :3 12:24, 18 October 2014 (UTC) cupcake1075  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cupcake1075 (talk • contribs)  

Doctor Who Edits

Hello Arthur

I hope you will understand I am very angry that Stven Moffatt has wrecked my favourite programme. I hope he is fired nad the story wiped from continuity. Until that happens I will never watch the show again and am selling all my Doctor Who stuff. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.22.164.252 (talk) 22:17, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Get a grip you idiot Rhysy54 (talk) 23:06, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Please can you show me the ropes?

Hi, You removed my edit of QI because I didn't leave a <ref>, this was my first attempted at editing and would like it if you could show me how I should have edited the page correctly. --71.236.166.212 (talk) 11:13, 2 December 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael Turner 96 (talk • contribs) 17:11, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Live Edit War

I was learning about mockbusters and started reading about Mac and Me... when I saw in the article summary that it's considered one of the greatest movies ever made?!

Seems I stumbled on a very random edit war; your stoic reprimand of the vandal entertained me. Keep up the good fight!

Thank you for RC patrol

Hello. I just ran across you while doing Recent Changes patrol. I see you're doing quite a bit of it yourself. Thank you. The more, the merrier.  :) 71.236.166.212 (talk) 11:13, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Arthur Holland. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Arthur Holland. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Arthur Holland. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Arthur Holland. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Arthur Holland. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Isabel Fay

The article Isabel Fay has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)