ArthBH

A tag has been placed on ArthBH, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:ArthBH. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. janejellyroll 10:07, 19 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Goonks

edit

A tag has been placed on Goonks, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Goonks. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. TexMurphy 10:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as The Eye Jab. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. NawlinWiki 02:01, 20 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Arthbh

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Arthbh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BigDunc (talk) 13:03, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bowness Monster.

edit

Hi, I suggest you find a couple external links to support the article, else it might be deleted as non-notable. · AndonicO Hail! 13:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bowness Monster

edit
 

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Bowness Monster, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 13:14, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

January 2008

edit
 

Hi, the recent edit you made to Bowness Monster has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. - ALLSTAR echo 13:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

The recent edit you made to Bowness Monster constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. - ALLSTAR echo 13:58, 29 January 2008 (UTC))Reply

 

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Bowness Monster. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. - ALLSTAR echo 13:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Mysolipintanious

edit
 

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Mysolipintanious, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. FlyingToaster 18:22, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply