Artegemini

Does anyone read our comments or is it just fun to produce more problems? Artegemini (talk) 08:07, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

There are NO COPYRIGHTED MATERIALS on this page! These materials are owned by us, who created this article! Artegemini (talk) 07:35, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

MozART group

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of MozART group, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.mozartgroup.org/bio.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:00, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page MozART group has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/themozartgroup. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:21, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page MozART group do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/themozartgroup. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ireneusz krosny

The article Ireneusz krosny has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Coolug (talk) 13:03, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

SOLVEDArtegemini (talk) 18:50, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ireneusz Krosny

A tag has been placed on Ireneusz Krosny requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.   -- Lear's Fool 14:19, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Status and Advice

As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article, because --quie apart from the copyright--it was hopelessly promotional.

You said on the article talk p. "The text here is the same one as at www.krosny.net Created by arte gemini There is no reason to delete this page. Text AND images are property of the artist and artegemini. Can be proved at www.krosny.net Artegemini (talk) 16:16, 27 July 2010 (UTC)"

You need to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online. The review in chicago Reader is acceptable as one of them, but it has to be cited properly --the link is http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/IssueArchives?issue=869847; citations from published sources for the awards are needed also. Equally important, you need to write like an encyclopedia article, not a press release--don't praise the subject or speculate on the sources of his artistry, say what he does, and give the awards with their references. As for the material from his web site, I'd advise you to rewrite it for Wikipedia. Yes, you can give us permission according to WP:DCM, following all the formal requirements there--and you should do this for the photo. But with respect to the text, the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable. When you have the material assembled, just write a new article--you do not need special permission. DGG ( talk ) 19:21, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Mozart group

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mozart group, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.mozartgroup.org/bio.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:48, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Advice the same thing applies here--send permission for the photo, and rewrite the text with exact references and language that is not so promotional. DGG ( talk ) 19:23, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Your addition to Mozart group has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Steamroller Assault (talk) 19:58, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give MozART group a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Steamroller Assault (talk) 20:01, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Final Warning

On at least three separate occasions, you have been warned against adding copyrighted materials to Wikipedia. Those warnings also included a link on how to go through the process of donating copyrighted materials. However, I have to agree with User:DGG that much of your copyrighted text is highly promotional in nature, and would have to be entirely rewritten in order to become encyclopedic.

If you persist in adding copyrighted materials to Wikipedia without explicit consent, you will be blocked from editing. Steamroller Assault (talk) 06:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Steamroller Assault (talk) 07:07, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of MozART group

A tag has been placed on MozART group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Acather96 (talk) 07:46, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to MozART group. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 08:03, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to MozART group. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Shadowjams (talk) 08:04, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

This is your final warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to MozART group. Shadowjams (talk) 08:06, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Artegemini. You have new messages at Talk:MozART group.
Message added 08:15, 28 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Copyright

It is not sufficient to assert that you own the copyright: for one thing, we have no way to know that you are who you say, and for another, release to Wikipedia involves more than just permission to reproduce - under the terms of the license, it irrevocably gives permission to anyone to copy, edit and reproduce for any purpose. It is necessary that the copyright holder understands and agrees to this - see Wikipedia:Copyrights#Contributors' rights and obligations. Therefore, as you have been told already, if you wish to use copyright material it is essential to follow the steps explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. However, it is often best to rewrite material for Wikipedia, because personal or organizational websites usually have a promotional tone unsuitable for an encyclopedia article, which requires a neutral point of view - Wikipedia is not simply a notice-board onto which to pin promotional material. JohnCD (talk) 09:45, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Conflict of interest guideline

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 09:45, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

MozART group

Please understand that we can not accept text which is copyrighted at some other web site. You may be its author, but we can not easily verify it. Please do read WP:DCM and follow the procedures. Alternatively, you can consider releasing the content of some of your pages free (creative commons or similar license), placing a corresponding note. Please do not re-add copyrighted text, as this WILL result in blocking your account. Materialscientist (talk) 09:50, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but it is considered inappropriate for such groups to use Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organization for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, or organization. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

What can I do now?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company or organization. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

• Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
• Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
• Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, please see how to appeal a block. JohnCD (talk) 11:09, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

• It is clear that this is the PR group Arte Gemini promoting its clients. JohnCD (talk) 11:12, 28 July 2010 (UTC)