Arolión Yolenda
Hullo german friend.
Passant par hasard sur ton "user page" j'ai remarqué des commentaires qui m'on bien fait rire et des descriptions rigolotes, bref... Möchte ich im besonderen weissen, ob ich diese "userboxes" benutzen darf;
 | This user would like to know what a black hole looks like from inside, but doesn't want to investigate it personally. |
 | This user supports the peaceful reunification of the Koreas. |
Anyway I wouldn't mind whether you want to keep it for your own UserP.
Qui tacet, consentire videtur !
Meilleures salutations Mrpouetpouet 17:14, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
| very interesting and creative userpage Iamjoyandlove (talk) 07:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC) |
These ones for exemple ^_^:
- This user does not understand why you have to spend at school so many years.
- There are too many people who don’t know that they’re even worse than their children at spelling!
- This user thinks that conjugation is a stupid and annoying invention, but respects it despite all.
- let your brain shrivel ...... or maybe has it already?
Puis-je utiliser les images susnommées (cf, message précédent) ? Amicalement Mrpouetpouet 17:01, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
The article Heinrich Donatus, Hereditary Prince of Schaumburg-Lippe has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Taroaldo (talk) 22:10, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Survey edit
Hi Arolión!
I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!
It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!
Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!
Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 15:57, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
WikiWomen's Collaborative edit
| WikiWomen Unite! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi Arolión Yolenda! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:
We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved! |
WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)! edit
| WikiWomen - We need you! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi Arolión Yolenda! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by:
Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:21, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for April 21 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Effi Briest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baltic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:14, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Please read the Manual of style before editing article text on English Wikipedia. edit
Hi, Arolión Yolenda,
Twice I have seen you do edits to the article Marilyn vos Savant that include adding curly quotation marks ( “ ‘ ’ ” ) to article text. But the Wikipedia Manual of Style says, "Typographical, or curly, quotation marks and apostrophes might be read more efficiently; and many think they look more professional. But for practical reasons the straight versions are recommended, and double rather than single quotation marks as primary." Several Wikipedia editors use automated tools to change curly quotation marks to straight quotation marks in articles throughout English Wikipedia, so there is basically never a good reason to change straight quotation marks to curly quotation marks. It's best to discuss the rationale for some of your other editing decisions on the article talk page before doing the edits, as many of them are rather puzzling to native speakers of English like me. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 17:58, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, Arolión Yolenda. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Heinrich Donatus, Hereditary Prince of Schaumburg-Lippe for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heinrich Donatus, Hereditary Prince of Schaumburg-Lippe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heinrich Donatus, Hereditary Prince of Schaumburg-Lippe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Surtsicna (talk) 17:12, 2 August 2020 (UTC)