This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. I've removed the colours you attached to the polling for the Dutch general election, 2012. My reason for doing so is that it runs counter to the format for the polling of previous Dutch (and others) elections. Rsloch (talk) 11:17, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Hey
Latest comment: 11 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion
You're German, not Dutch! No Dutchman would defend the Germans. Besides, I love the Dutch, so I can tell you're not Dutch. Hairgelmare (talk) 23:05, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
I am Dutch, but the tendency to blame the Germans for the crisis is just Germany bashing. I am a huge fan of Europe, and it is this kind of sentiment that is going to destroy it. Everybody made mistakes, almost non out of bad intentions. Arnoutf (talk) 06:37, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Lies. I love the Dutch, but I do not love you. That means you are not Dutch. You Germans are the reason this problem is not being resolved. Kisses from London. Hairgelmare (talk) 08:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
So you accuse me of lies. This means I no longer have any reason to assume any good faith towards you anymore. Arnoutf (talk) 08:59, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Please do not be angry. I sent you kisses. Perhaps you are Dutch. Perhaps you a right-wing Dutchman. That is a possibility. Hairgelmare (talk) 14:15, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Perhaps you should be more civil and make sure that you don't push your own point of view about Germany's role. Arnoutf (talk) 16:48, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
I love the Dutch. Peace out. Hairgelmare (talk) 18:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
August 2012
Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Your recent editing history at Greek government-debt crisis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ.λόγοςπράξις 21:39, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Get real, I made 1 revert, you are already at 3. Arnoutf (talk) 21:42, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
FWIW, thank you for your contributions and the civility of your comments. Despite our few initial misunderstandings, I agree with you on many points. It is also easy to collaborate with you because you are a civil and well-informed editor. So, again, thanks. Δρ.Κ.λόγοςπράξις 23:25, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXVII, August 2012
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Just a note, plot information doesn't need to be referenced for extant works (see WP:FILMPLOT and numerous featured articles on films). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:10, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Sorry may have given wrong reason. Still, considering rest of article I think C is a fair class. Arnoutf (talk) 09:12, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Oh, no biggie on that. Just so you know. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:13, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
No problem ;-) Arnoutf (talk) 09:15, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I'm quite impressed by the several months of classification backlog that you seem to be working your way through. Ten pages on my watchlist alone. Having done the same thing for the Indonesian project, I know exactly how much a pain it can be. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:31, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 08:37, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXVIII, September 2012
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
