Armughanpk1

February 2013

Hello, I'm MrX. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Chak No.217G.B, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - MrX 21:13, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Chak No.217G.B shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. - MrX 13:06, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

You've been warned here per the result of the edit warring complaint about Chak No.217G.B. If you continue to try to force unsourced material into the article you may be blocked. Now would be a good time to consider whether you can find any WP:Reliable sources at all for this article. If there are none, the article may be nominated for deletion. If this place is important, somebody must have written about it, at least a newspaper. Another possibility is to merge anything which has sources into Samundri Tehsil. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 00:26, 9 February 2013 (UTC)