Arlenekaddy

January 2019

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Video resume, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. [1] GermanJoe (talk) 13:57, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 16:51, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arlenekaddy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here Arlenekaddy (talk) 16:57, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:57, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arlenekaddy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I ask you to unblock me. I just shared useful information that I took on various sites and put a link to them. so that later they would not say that I stole the text. This was done not for promotional purposes, but because, in my opinion, this is useful and necessary information that could help Wikipedia users. Arlenekaddy (talk) 08:18, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your additions were blatant advertising; I don't believe for a moment that you are here to help build an encyclopedia. Spam for your employers ≠ "Useful and necessary information" for Wikipedia's readers. Yunshui ^雲_水 09:47, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have verified with off-wiki evidence that the above is an attempt to mislead us. This editor has a very direct undeclared conflict of interest. This is not a case where the user found useful information on various sites. Arlenekaddy, note that we can blacklist your site to prevent others continuing to spam it here on Wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 14:45, 22 March 2019 (UTC)