June 2018 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Arkel International has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:59, 8 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Response to Paid editing edit

I do not work for a paid editing service nor am I being paid to make any updates. The owner of Arkel asked me to update the page as a favor, the Arkel website was recently updated as well. The changes in content are consistent with the data that is on the updated Arkel website. www.arkel.com

Thank you. Please read about editing with a conflict of interest. Also, please not that Wikipedia only cares about what independent, third party reliable sources have to say about an article subject and may use self published material like a web site only in very limited circumstances.
Copying material from elsewhere is also prohibited unless that content has been released under a compatible free license or is in the public domain. Please see WP:COPYRIGHT for more information.
I looked over the Arkel article and, as it stands, I do not believe it meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for organizations. Please carefully read the notability guidelines. They require significant coverage independent, third party reliable sources to meet Wikipedia's inclusion criteria and without such coverage the article is very likely to be nominated for deletion.
Please follow the blue links. Those terms have a specific meaning on Wikipedia and the links provide more details. Jbh Talk 18:32, 11 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

 

Hello Arkelbd. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Arkelbd. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Arkelbd|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message.

 

You still have not responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing.

You have continued to edit without responding to this inquiry and added copyrighted material to the article [1]. Jbh Talk 16:34, 8 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Response to June 2018 edit

No copyright data was added to the page. All the data added is publicaly available. Most of the updates come from the Arkel International website, www.arkel.com.

June 2018 edit

  Your addition to Arkel International has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Jbh Talk 16:35, 8 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Arkelbd, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Arkelbd! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 9 June 2018 (UTC)