Ariellavt

Your recent addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Virtually everything you've entered is going to have to be deleted. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 14:48, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Time out for a moment, please

As I pointed out, I suspect that your plot synopses are copyright violations, possibly taken from print. Please do not repost these articles without writing the synopses and other sections in your own words and without the "advertising speak." --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:22, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

No problem. It's just that there's a "shoot first, ask questions later" attitude toward potential copyright violations because of the potential (and very severe) legal issues involved. Since the text is in fact yours, you are of course welcome to contribute it. Sorry about the mix-up and I hope you'll understand where I'm coming from on this. Thanks for being nice about this, by the way. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:17, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Oops...there is in fact a copyright issue here, not to mention a conflict of interest issue. I initiated a discussion at the administrators' noticboard, found here:[1]

Sorry, but all of these have to go. If you're connected with the company, you or someone would have to release your copyright on your site to the free documentation license on this site. This effectively voids your original copyright. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:08, 28 August 2009 (UTC)