Arh'lupia
Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 20:08, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Tropical Storm Ike edit
Please provide an authoritative source which shows that Ike is now a hurricane. Plasticup T/C 20:09, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to 2008 Atlantic hurricane season. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Unless you can cite an authoritative source your persistent claim that Ike is a hurricane will be regarded as vandalism. Plasticup T/C 20:16, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Block edit
You were blocked for violating the 3RR rule. You were warned repeatedly about edit warring. That's not how we do things here, even if you think you're right. You can edit this page; give me a link to this BEST track, that you repeated so often yet never bothered to link. --Golbez (talk) 20:34, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- I will unblock you if you start talking to me here. You showed a complete lack of willingness to communicate until you got blocked. --Golbez (talk) 20:42, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
It's over. At 1800Z, Ike became a hurricane, but at the update of 2100Z for NHC, Ike is even more powerfull, 948 hPa et 70 knots. This thing can be very fast to intendifie sometimes.
- That doesn't matter. You can't say it's true. You have to provide evidence. Yes, with the NHC update we now have a link; you outright refused to offer any link that said this. Do you understand what you did wrong? --Golbez (talk) 20:47, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I understand. I thinked you know an other site than NHC.But, it was so fast ! I know, I participate to this fury, but I have no any time to communicate. It so difficult to write when the hands shake.
Arh'lupia (talk) 20:51, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- I go to slepp. I can stay an other minut insted of my screen
I'm unblocking; the point was made. Please communicate with others next time, and give links. --Golbez (talk) 21:01, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
The article Getrag 560G transmission has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 15:17, 14 April 2010 (UTC)