Arghoslent

Sources and civility

If your edits are challenged, the onus is on you to include a reliable source in the form of an inline citation when restoring disputed content. Wikipedia articles are not a reliable source as they consist of user-generated content. Responding with incivility, as you have done, when policies are explained to you is not an option if you want to continue editing here.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:22, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent edit warring and an inability to edit civilly and collaboratively as is required by policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:04, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

• Link to AN/I report.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:07, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

  What's wrong with you?

  I added some infos without any vandalism. Later I added a machine that is actually in use by the Ukrainian army. Afther that I added arguments such as video of destroying of Ukrainian MT-T by a Russian kamikaze drone, and as a bonus the source to Wiki page that tells that MT-T was developed in Ukraine. Isn't it enough?

  But that crybaby with a watchman syndrome revert my additions again and again with the same stupid reason as a parrot.

  Is it a new kind of a nerdism? Because some user need a source in an every single line of text. Sources! More sources for the god of sources!

  And after that you call it "inability to edit civilly and collaboratively".

  Is the English Wikipedia ruled by a bunch of crybabies with some psychiatric superiority and watchman complexes? Arghoslent (talk) 21:26, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

  - MT-T developed and produced in Kharkiv, Ukraine.

  - One active MT-T was hit by the Russian kamikaze drone few weeks ago.

  Hmmm, does Ukrainian army have MT-Ts in equipment?

  Hmmm, I don't know... It is not clear...

  Some nerds need more sources! Those ones is not enough! Arghoslent (talk) 21:38, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

• Arghoslent, you retain access to this talk page in order to allow you to post a block appeal by following the directions in the block message, not to continue the same behaviour that let to your block.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:40, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

  Ok, look. I added some info because I tried to make the article better. It was not a vandalism, not a trolling, wasn't it?

  I added three machines (Ovid, GT-MU, and MT-T) and one of them are reverted again and again by that user because of absent of sources - he thinks that obligatory.

  I gave a video prove as a comment in edition window because I still don't know how to paste correctly links in article. Obviously, he knows how to do it, but prefer not to do it. He thinks that would be better to revert my edits again and again.

  Sure, I'm angry. Arghoslent (talk) 21:59, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

  Are you here?

  Here's another evidence: Ukrainian MT-T is towing the captured Russian T-80BV (https://twitter.com/UAWeapons/status/1596615546186915841?s=20&t=cbdCalsTZ53A39tubcywOg)

  Is it still not enough? So paste that link or previous link from Youtube.

  Stop that bureaucracy and unban me. Arghoslent (talk) 23:11, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

  @Ponyo are you here? Arghoslent (talk) 15:36, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

• Stop pinging me. The instructions for requesting an appeal or included in my block message. Your continued insistence that your edits are correct will not result in an unblock of your account.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:16, 28 November 2022 (UTC)