WikiProject iconBiography NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconAlternative Views NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconEnvironment NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis environment-related page is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized.
Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

RfC: Should this article be deleted? edit

This article is currently under consideration for deletion (reasons: N, RS, COI, RESUME.). At the time this section was added, the discussion stood at one comment for deletion, and one against. Further comment on the article's merit (or lack) would be appreciated. Arfisk (talk) 21:42, 19 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Additional material edit

List any suggestions for additional material here (with refs). Arfisk (talk) 12:34, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

(To avoid excessive clutter, remove material that has been added. Note links that have been rejected, so they aren't inadvertently re-inserted.) Arfisk (talk) 23:06, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Biography edit

This page is currently under review for deletion. One current criticism is that the article currently reads like a resume rather than a biography. Fair point, although I would suggest a person is made 'notable' more by their body of work than how they live. That discussion is being had elsewhere. Meanwhile, a Biography section would be worthwhile... when references that meet [WP:BLP] guidelines can be found. Arfisk (talk) 01:38, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Projects edit

Cascio's work in transhuman space should be mentioned, since two publications are listed. Good place to add Humanist contributions in general. Arfisk (talk) 12:08, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Useful links edit

Online reference links to be added (remove as they are added):

There should be a separate section for Essay listings. Arfisk (talk) 05:50, 23 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Done. However, essay listings look a bit dry, and really only duplicate the reference section. Suggest a rewrite as descriptive sentences summarising the points of each article. Arfisk (talk) 04:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Publications edit

Superstruct edit

Quality improvements edit

Biography edit

List suggestions to improve biography quality here. Arfisk (talk) 09:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Quality criteria suggests the content is at 'Start' level: current references being valid and reliable. More descriptive content would round the article up. Arfisk (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Once additional references are included, consider what's needed to raise to 'c' level (Incidentally, I realise this is currently a one man show, and I won't doing any boosting without seeking other opinions.). Arfisk (talk) 23:34, 24 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Alternate Views edit

List suggestions to improve Alternate View quality here. Arfisk (talk) 09:03, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure this Article fits the criteria for this Classification. The Subject is a forecaster, who describes future scenarios based on current social/technological trends. He may come up with some surprising predictions, but that doesn't necessarily mean he espouses 'alternate' views. Will reconsider when more content is added. Arfisk (talk) 23:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
The 'Humanist' project would be more appropriate but, again, is it truly relevant? Arfisk (talk) 23:39, 24 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Environment edit

List suggestions to improve Environment quality here. Arfisk (talk) 09:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Importance Rating edit

Alternate views edit

Assess importance to this Project. Arfisk (talk) 09:10, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Environment edit

Assess importance to this Project. Arfisk (talk) 09:10, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notability issues edit

I have added two notable citation sources which, I think, should be sufficient to establish notability of the Subject. Unless there are objections, I will remove the tag in a couple of days. Arfisk (talk) 04:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Actually, it seems acceptable to remove the tag now. I daresay I'll hear about it if not! Arfisk (talk) 08:55, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Pronunciation edit

How do you pronounce his name? --JWB (talk) 20:23, 26 April 2011 (UTC)Reply