And Rew

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, And Rew, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Talk:List of largest empires. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Elockid ^(Talk) 22:51, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (biographies)

Hi and welcome to Wikipedia. I moved your question at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (biographies) to the bottom of the page. On talk pages, such as that, we put new sections at the bottom of the page. Maurreen (talk) 07:38, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

WP:MOSFLAG

Please careful review WIki's MOS policies on flag icons; we don't use them in infoboxes, as it gives over-emphasis to an individual's nationality. Thanks. --Madchester (talk) 23:51, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

There's some special exceptions for infoboxes. i.e., military figures and Olympic athletes, but otherwise flag icons are generally not used in infoboxes. --Madchester (talk) 23:50, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Martin Tyler, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.   — Jeff G. ツ 00:49, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Robert Aumann. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. N419BH 01:34, 20 June 2010 (UTC)(See below for explanation of strikethrough N419BH 02:56, 20 June 2010 (UTC))

Please stop reverting other people's edits, as you are doing in Martin Tyler. You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. If you revert again, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Please discuss any disputed changes on the talk page. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ 02:51, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Post on my talk page

As far as I know, the accepted norm on Wikipedia is for nationalities to be expressed with the "/". However, I cannot find any documentation of this so I will cross out my notice. My apologies for accusing you of vandalism.

The other caution, however, is legitimate. I am not exactly sure on the details, but it is an accepted norm for citizens of the U.K. to express their nationality as "English", "Welsh", "Scottish", etc. I will notify one of the British editors here who can provide a more thorough explanation. N419BH 02:55, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Greetings. :) Welcome to Wikipedia, looks like you're off to a rocky start, but I'm here to help. Generally, British citizens are described by their constituent country (English, Welsh, Scottish...), especially where there is a strong tie to that country. This kind of thing should only really be changed where the subject themselves publicly identifies one way or another or when it's unclear which constituent country they have the strongest ties to. For example, Sir James Black was a Scottish scientist, Lily Cole is an English model, whereas John Prescott could be legitimately changed to "British" because of his Welsh roots, but he live and works in England. Basically, when it comes to things like that, if it ain't broke, don't fix it- a lot of people get way too het up about that kind of thing. You can always discuss it (calmly and making your point rationally) on the talk apge if you think it needs to be changed. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:14, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

No worries. :) I'm an administrator on here, so I can be surprisingly useful if you need any help in future! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:20, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Ethnicity

I noticed your edits to Laura Schlessinger to remove the mention of her ethnicity and I am confused by your rationale. Wikipedia recognizes ethnicity where the ethnicity is claimed by the subject or when it is not controversial. If you had said that Dr Laura did not claim to be Italian or Jewish, I would understand, but your comment "Wikipedia does not put extra emphasis on ethnicity" confuses me. The infobox has a field for ethnicity, after all. Could you explain your reasoning further? Thanks, Celestra (talk) 20:47, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your response. I have read, and agree with, the section to which you refer. I've had the misfortune of cleaning up after editors who've added ethnicity to the lede for no reason. (So and so is an XYZ singer.) I'd have gone the other way on the infobox but if you have a consensus and don't run into opposition, I guess it doesn't harm the article. Thanks again, Celestra (talk) 22:57, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Combining references

I saw your question at the help desk; I went ahead and made the change - if you look at the code now, you can see how to do it in the future. (In short, I added a name to the first reference, then used that name for the second reference. The key, which is sometimes missed, is to add a "/" to the subsequent uses of the ref.)--SPhilbrickT 12:46, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Angel Pavement may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:48, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, And Rew. You have new messages at A930913's talk page.
Message added 03:47, 13 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:And Rew/John Darwin has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Darwin, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 20:00, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Darwin.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:55, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Darwin concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Darwin, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:16, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Darwin concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Darwin, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:50, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Darwin concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Darwin, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:52, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, And Rew. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, And Rew. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, And Rew. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)