Welcome edit

Hello, Aprilkap, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Aprilkap, good luck, and have fun.| Uncle Milty | talk | 00:39, 3 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Aprilkap, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Aprilkap! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:21, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: WNYC Studios (March 13) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RadioFan was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
RadioFan (talk) 14:54, 13 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

The declination reason provided, "...this draft can be significantly expanded. With 27 references I'd expect a lot more content in the article. Please use those references to gather information to share more with the reader about this subject" is subjective, and is not a part of the reviewing instructions at WP:AFCR. North America1000 02:21, 18 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: WNYC Studios has been accepted edit

 
WNYC Studios, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

North America1000 02:17, 18 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The New Yorker Radio Hour (April 27) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 05:56, 27 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

May 2016 edit

  Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Draft:The New Yorker Radio Hour while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address per person. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:28, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The New Yorker Radio Hour has been accepted edit

 
The New Yorker Radio Hour, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:29, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Re: 2 Dope Queens edit

Thank you for starting this article. I hope you don't mind, but I added the article to Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Pride 2016/Results, which tracks new and improved LGBT-related content as part of an ongoing Wiki Loves Pride campaign. If you create or improve other LGBT articles between now and the end of June, feel free to update this page with your contributions. Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:18, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Only Human (podcast) edit

 

Hello, Aprilkap. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Only Human".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 10:47, 2 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Imanigold for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Imanigold is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imanigold until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 18:34, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Reply