Hello Appioverdi! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Hipal (talk) 01:10, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

January 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm HurricaneEdgar. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. HurricaneEdgar 03:23, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

May 2021 edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. --Hipal (talk) 16:25, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

[1] --Hipal (talk) 01:24, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Hipal (talk) 20:39, 15 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

[2] --Hipal (talk) 01:24, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

It is referenced, twice. From sources that are different geographically and ideologically. One a tv network, the other a newspaper. Both with an established reputation as news sources. One has the original tweet attached, you cannot defame someone if the claim is factual and well proved. Now, prove that those sources are wrong by providing other sources, or stop deleting perfectly valid content. We could discuss on the positioning of the material, but you even cancelled it from the controversy section. Why are you so committed in making facts disappear from her wiki? Appioverdi (talk) 00:10, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for responding. You may not have noticed, but the article is under protection because of disputes over this content. Could you respond on the article talk page, where I've been reviewing the references as they've been offered? Let's keep the discussion there. --Hipal (talk) 01:13, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

A lengthy welcome edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.

Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily in collaboration.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

If you find yourself in a disagreement with another editor, it's best to discuss the matter on the relevant talk page.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal (talk) 01:10, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply