Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 20) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 19:25, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Apersonofinterest20, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:25, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:Apersonofinterest20/sandbox edit

 

Hello, Apersonofinterest20. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. North America1000 03:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Stephen Barclay MP edit

An edit was made to Bob Barclays working life following an incorrect article published in the Blackpool Gazette following information received from WIKIPEDIA. Bob Barclay can be contacted directly on the email below

From: Bob Barclay <rbjpb99@gmail.com>

Date: 8 July 2022 at 12:36:59 BST


The Wikipedia entry is for Stephen Barclay MP

The incorrect bit I want changed is in the early life and education section.

It says  His father worked as a full time trade union official and then in IT.

It should read His father worked in IT for 55 years, during which he was seconded for 3 years to the company’s Staff Association, which later became the Banking and Insurance Union.

Best regards.

Bob

Apersonofinterest20 (talk) 13:53, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply